The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2007;89:979-986.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.00440
© 2007 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the exam for this article:
 Sports Test 11: Summer 2007 (publication date August 15, 2007; expiration d...
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Neill, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, S. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Neill, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, S. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Foot/Ankle
Right arrow Sports
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Excursion and Strain of the Superficial Peroneal Nerve During Inversion Ankle Sprain

Patrick J. O'Neill, MD1, Brent G. Parks, MSc1, Russell Walsh, BSc1, Lucia M. Simmons, BSc1 and Stuart D. Miller, MD1

1 Union Memorial Orthopaedics, The Johnston Professional Building, #400, 3333 North Calvert Street, Baltimore, MD 21218. E-mail address for S.D. Miller (c/o Lyn Camire, Editor): lyn.camire{at}medstar.net

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland

Disclosure: The authors did not receive any outside funding or grants in support of their research for or preparation of this work. Neither they nor a member of their immediate families received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division, center, clinical practice, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors, or a member of their immediate families, are affiliated or associated.

Background: Traction is presumed to be the mechanism of injury to the superficial peroneal nerve in an inversion ankle sprain, but it is not known whether the amount of strain caused by nerve traction is sufficient to cause nerve injury. We hypothesized that the superficial peroneal nerve would experience significant excursion and strain during a simulated inversion sprain, that sectioning of the anterior talofibular ligament would increase excursion and strain, and that an impact force would produce strain in a range that can structurally alter the nerve.

Methods: Differential reluctance transducers were placed in the superficial peroneal nerve in sixteen lower-extremity cadaver specimens to measure excursion and strain in situ. Static weight was applied to the foot in increments starting at 0.454 kg and ending at 4.54 kg. The anterior talofibular ligament was sectioned, and the measurements were repeated. A final impact force of 4.54 kg was applied to each specimen. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to evaluate differences in excursion and strain.

Results: The mean excursion and strain of the superficial peroneal nerve increased with increases in the applied weight in both the group with the intact anterior talofibular ligament and the group in which it had been sectioned. Nerve excursion was greater in the sectioned-ligament group than in the intact-ligament group with all applied weights (p < 0.05). The mean nerve strain was greater in the sectioned-ligament group (range, 5.5% to 12.9%) than in the intact-ligament group (range, 3.0% to 11.6%) with application of the 0.454, 0.908, 1.362, and 1.816-kg weights (p < 0.05). With the ligament sectioned, the 4.54-kg impact force produced significantly higher mean nerve excursion and strain than did the 4.54-kg static weight (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: The magnitude of strain with the impact force was in the lower range of values that have been shown to structurally alter peripheral nerves. The superficial peroneal nerve is at risk for traction injury during an ankle inversion sprain and is at additional risk with more severe sprains or with an insufficient anterior talofibular ligament.

Clinical Relevance: Nerve injury may contribute to the high rate of residual morbidity after inversion ankle sprains.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JBJSHome page
R. C. Marx and M. S. Mizel
What's New in Foot and Ankle Surgery
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2008; 90(4): 928 - 942.
[Full Text] [PDF]