The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2007;89:923-928.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.00776
© 2007 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the activity for this article:
Trauma Test 18: Summer 2007 (publication date August 15, 2007; expiration d...
Right arrow [Supplementary Material]
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Webb, L. X.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Webb, L. X.
Related Collections
Right arrow Adult Trauma
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Analysis of Surgeon-Controlled Variables in the Treatment of Limb-Threatening Type-III Open Tibial Diaphyseal Fractures

Lawrence X. Webb, MD1, Michael J. Bosse, MD2, Renan C. Castillo, MS3, Ellen J. MacKenzie, PhD3 the LEAP Study Group

1 Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1070
2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, P.O. Box 32861, Charlotte, NC 28232
3 Center for Injury Research and Policy, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Hygiene and Public Health, 624 North Broadway, Room 554, Baltimore, MD 21205

Investigation performed at Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina; and Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland

Disclosure: In support of their research for or preparation of this work, one or more of the authors received, in any one year, outside funding or grants in excess of $10,000 from the National Institutes of Health and the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases. Neither they nor a member of their immediate families received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division, center, clinical practice, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors, or a member of their immediate families, are affiliated or associated.

A commentary is available with the electronic versions of this article, on our web site (www.jbjs.org) and on our quarterly CD-ROM (call our subscription department, at 781-449-9780, to order the CD-ROM).


Background: The open tibial diaphyseal fracture remains a treatment challenge. The purpose of the present analysis of the long-term follow-up data on a previously reported cohort of patients was to identify surgeon-controlled variables that affected fracture union, complications, and final outcome in patients who had sustained a severe open tibial shaft fracture.

Methods: A cohort of 156 patients with a limb-threatening open tibial diaphyseal fracture was identified from the Lower Extremity Assessment Project (LEAP) study group. The patients were prospectively followed for two to seven years. In addition to the Sickness Impact Profile, other outcome metrics included the time to fracture union as well as the occurrence of infection and other complications that required rehospitalization. Statistical differences between groups were calculated.

Results: Within the parameters of the present study, the timing of débridement, the timing of soft-tissue coverage, and the timing of bone-graft placement had no effect on outcome. Patients in whom the fracture was definitively treated with an external fixator had more surgical procedures, took longer to achieve full weight-bearing status, and had more readmissions to the hospital for the treatment of infection and nonunion than did those in whom the fracture was treated with an intramedullary nail. Patients undergoing external fixation who also had a muscle flap for wound coverage had more physical impairment and a worse functional outcome than did patients who had an amputation.

Conclusions: Surgeons should carefully consider alternative treatment options for patients who have a severe open tibial fracture when limb salvage is perceived to require the combination of external fixation for fracture fixation and a muscle flap for wound coverage.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. J. Keeling, D. E. Gwinn, S. M. Tintle, R. C. Andersen, and F. X. McGuigan
Short-Term Outcomes of Severe Open Wartime Tibial Fractures Treated with Ring External Fixation
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2008; 90(12): 2643 - 2651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Letters to the Editor:

Read all Letters to the Editor

Outcomes Following Type III Open Tibial Diaphyseal Fractures
Lakhwani Prakash Om, MS, DNB (Orth.)
JBJS Online, 21 Feb 2008 [Full text]
Dr. Webb and colleagues respond to Dr. Om
Lawrence X Webb, et al.
JBJS Online, 8 Sep 2008 [Full text]