The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2007;89:1081-1089.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.00330
© 2007 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Assessing Osteolysis with Use of High-Throughput Protein Chips
Arun S. Shanbhag, PhD, MBA1,
Adam M. Kaufman, MD1,
Koichiro Hayata, MD1 and
Harry E. Rubash, MD1
1 Biomaterials Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, GRJ 1115, 55 Fruit
Street, Boston, MA 02114. E-mail address for A.S. Shanbhag:
shanbhag{at}helix.mgh.harvard.edu
Investigation performed at the Biomaterials Laboratory, Massachusetts
General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Disclosure: In support of their research for or preparation of this
work, one or more of the authors received, in any one year, outside funding or
grants in excess of $10,000 from Zimmer, Inc. Neither they nor a member of
their immediate families received payments or other benefits or a commitment
or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial
entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any
research fund, foundation, division, center, clinical practice, or other
charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors, or a member of
their immediate families, are affiliated or associated.
Background: Previous studies of bone resorption around failed joint
replacements have focused on a limited number of cytokines, primarily tumor
necrosis factor- (TNF- ), interleukin (IL)-1, and IL-6, with use
of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunohistochemistry techniques. In
this study, we utilized high-throughput protein chips to profile twenty-nine
inflammatory cytokines around failed total joint replacements.
Methods: Peri-implant granulomatous tissues were harvested from
around the failed total hip prostheses of thirteen patients. Synovial lining
capsular tissues from thirteen patients with end-stage degenerative joint
disease were used as controls. After homogenization, twenty-nine cytokines
were quantified with use of high-throughput protein chips.
Results: IL-6 and IL-8 were found consistently in failed joint
replacement tissues, reaffirming their prominent role in osteoclastogenesis
and end-stage bone resorption. High levels of interferon- -inducible
protein of 10 kDa (IP-10) and monokine induced by interferon- (MIG),
both chemoattractants of activated Th1 lymphocytes, were also detected.
Soluble intercellular adhesion molecule (sICAM) and transforming growth
factor- 1 (TGF- 1) were not detected universally, nor
were TNF- or IL-1. After a twenty-four-hour organ culture, IL-1
levels increased substantially along with those of other mediators. We
measured but did not detect any activators of cytotoxic T-cells,
antibody-producing Bcells, or eosinophils involved in delayed-type
hypersensitivity. Variations from patient to patient were seen across all
cytokines and highlight the unique response of individual patients to their
joint replacements.
Conclusions: In failed total joint replacements in patients with
end-stage osteolysis, IL-6 and IL-8 may be the primary drivers of
osteoclastogenesis. The presence of IP-10 and MIG imply a role for T-cells,
while TGF- 1 and sICAM may represent a systemic attempt to
modulate the inflammation. TNF- and IL-1 do not appear to play a major
role in the end stages of the disease.
Clinical Relevance: These results demonstrate that proteomic tools
can provide a foundation for understanding the cytokine-driven osteolysis
cascade and a base from which to identify and evaluate potential targets for
blockage or augmentation.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Facebook Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. S. Tuan, F. Y.-I. Lee, Y. T. Konttinen, J. M. Wilkinson, and R. L. Smith
What are the local and systemic biologic reactions and mediators to wear debris, and what host factors determine or modulate the biologic response to wear particles?
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg.,
July 1, 2008;
16(suppl_1):
S42 - S48.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. W. Bauer and A. S. Shanbhag
Are there biological markers of wear?
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg.,
July 1, 2008;
16(suppl_1):
S68 - S71.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|