The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2007;89:1066-1074.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.00200
© 2007 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Level-Dependent Coronal and Axial Moment-Rotation Corridors of Degeneration-Free Cervical Spines in Lateral Flexion
Narayan Yoganandan, PhD1,
Frank A. Pintar, PhD1,
Brian D. Stemper, PhD1,
Christopher E. Wolfla, MD1,
Barry S. Shender, PhD2 and
Glenn Paskoff, MS3
1 Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 West Wisconsin
Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53226. E-mail address for N. Yoganandan:
yoga{at}mcw.edu
2 Human Systems Department, NAVAIR, Code 4656, Building 2187, Suite 2280, 48110
Shaw Road, Unit 5, Patuxent River, MD 20670-1906
3 NAVAIR, Code 4.6.2.1, Building 2187, Suite 1280, 48110 Shaw Road, Unit 5,
Patuxent River, MD 20670-1906
Investigation performed at the Department of Neurosurgery, Medical
College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Disclosure: In support of their research for or preparation of this
work, one or more of the authors received, in any one year, outside funding or
grants in excess of $10,000 from the Office of Naval Research (contract
N00421-02-C-3005) and Veterans Affairs Medical Research. Neither they nor a
member of their immediate families received payments or other benefits or a
commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No
commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits
to any research fund, foundation, division, center, clinical practice, or
other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors, or a member
of their immediate families, are affiliated or associated.
Background: Aging, trauma, or degeneration can affect intervertebral
kinematics. While in vivo studies can determine motions, moments are not
easily quantified. Previous in vitro studies on the cervical spine have
largely used specimens from older individuals with varying levels of
degeneration and have shown that moment-rotation responses under lateral
bending do not vary significantly by spinal level. The objective of the
present in vitro biomechanical study was, therefore, to determine the coronal
and axial moment-rotation responses of degeneration-free, normal, intact human
cadaveric cervicothoracic spinal columns under the lateral bending mode.
Methods: Nine human cadaveric cervical columns from C2 to T1 were
fixed at both ends. The donors had ranged from twenty-three to forty-four
years old (mean, thirty-four years) at the time of death. Retroreflective
targets were inserted into each vertebra to obtain rotational kinematics in
the coronal and axial planes. The specimens were subjected to pure lateral
bending moment with use of established techniques. The range-of-motion and
neutral zone metrics for the coronal and axial rotation components were
determined at each level of the spinal column and were evaluated
statistically.
Results: Statistical analysis indicated that the two metrics were
level-dependent (p < 0.05). Coronal motions were significantly greater (p
< 0.05) than axial motions. Moment-rotation responses were nonlinear for
both coronal and axial rotation components under lateral bending moments. Each
segmental curve for both rotation components was well represented by a
logarithmic function (R2 > 0.95).
Conclusions: Range-of-motion metrics compared favorably with those
of in vivo investigations. Coronal and axial motions of degeneration-free
cervical spinal columns under lateral bending showed substantially different
level-dependent responses. The presentation of moment-rotation corridors for
both metrics forms a normative dataset for the degeneration-free cervical
spines.
Clinical Relevance: While clinical studies provide some information
on spinal motions, laboratory-driven experimental biomechanical studies allow
controlled load application, document motion magnitudes, and provide a
critical dataset of moment-rotation responses. Because these data are derived
from degeneration-free spines, validation efforts with use of this dataset
will greatly improve model predictabilities while studying the effects of
pathological processes, trauma, or instrumentation on spinal kinetics and,
hence, stability.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
|