The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2007;89:786-791.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.00315
© 2007 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Restore Orthobiologic Implant: Not Recommended for Augmentation of Rotator Cuff Repairs
Judie R. Walton, PhD1,
Nicholas K. Bowman, MBBS1,
Yasser Khatib, MBBS1,
James Linklater, MBBS2 and
George A.C. Murrell, MD, DPhil1
1 Orthopaedic Research Institute, Research and Education Centre, Level 2, 4-10
South Street, Sydney (Kogarah) NSW 2217, Australia. E-mail address for G.A.C.
Murrell:
admin{at}ori.org.au
2 Castlereagh Imaging, Crows Nest NSW, Australia
Investigation performed at the Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service,
Orthopaedic Research Institute, University of New South Wales, St. George
Hospital, Sydney (Kogarah), New South Wales, Australia
Disclosure: The authors did not receive any outside funding or
grants in support of their research for or preparation of this work. Neither
they nor a member of their immediate families received payments or other
benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a
commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or
direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division, center,
clinical practice, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which
the authors, or a member of their immediate families, are affiliated or
associated.
Background: Following repairs of large-to-massive tears of the
rotator cuff, the rates of tendon retears are high and often involve tissue
deficiency. Animal studies of the Restore Orthobiologic Implant, a
collagen-based material derived from the small intestine mucosa of pigs, have
indicated that it might be used to help overcome such problems. We carried out
a study to determine whether patients who received this xenograft to augment a
rotator cuff repair exhibited greater shoulder strength, shoulder function,
and/or resistance to retearing.
Methods: We compared data from a group of patients who had undergone
conventional rotator cuff repair with xenograft augmentation (the xenograft
group) with data from a group in whom a repair had been done by the same
surgeon without augmentation (the controls). The groups were matched for
gender, mean age, and mean size of the rotator cuff tear. All subjects
completed a pain and function questionnaire and were given a systematic
clinical shoulder examination preoperatively and at three, six, and
twenty-four months postoperatively. The twenty-four-month visit included
magnetic resonance imaging to determine whether a retear had occurred.
Results: Four patients who had received a xenograft had a severe
postoperative reaction requiring surgical treatment. At two years after the
surgery, six of the ten tendons repaired with a xenograft and seven of the
twelve control tendons had retorn, as documented by magnetic resonance
imaging. The patients with a xenograft had significantly less lift-off
strength, as measured with a dynamometer, and significantly less strength in
internal rotation and adduction than the controls at two years after the
surgery (all p < 0.05). Also, the xenograft group had significantly more
impingement in external rotation, a slower rate of resolution of pain during
activities, more difficulty with hand-behind-the-back activities, and less
sports participation (all p < 0.05).
Conclusions: Two years after surgical repair of a large rotator cuff
defect supplemented with a xenograft, patients had several persisting deficits
and no recognizable benefit as compared with the results in a control group.
In view of these findings, together with the unsatisfactorily high proportion
of patients with a severe inflammatory reaction to the xenograft, we do not
recommend use of the Restore Orthobiologic Implant in its present form.
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See
Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Facebook Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. A. Derwin, M. J. Codsi, R. A. Milks, A. R. Baker, J. A. McCarron, and J. P. Iannotti
Rotator Cuff Repair Augmentation in a Canine Model with Use of a Woven Poly-L-Lactide Device
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
May 1, 2009;
91(5):
1159 - 1171.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. J. Seeherman, J. M. Archambault, S. A. Rodeo, A. S. Turner, L. Zekas, D. D'Augusta, X. J. Li, E. Smith, and J. M. Wozney
rhBMP-12 Accelerates Healing of Rotator Cuff Repairs in a Sheep Model
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
October 1, 2008;
90(10):
2206 - 2219.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. V. Gulotta, C. Hidaka, S. A. Maher, M. E. Cunningham, and S. A. Rodeo
What's New in Orthopaedic Research
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
September 1, 2007;
89(9):
2092 - 2101.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|