The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2007;89:735-741.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.00708
© 2007 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Early Results of Conversion of a Failed Femoral Component in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty
Scott T. Ball, MD1,
Michel J. Le Duff, MA2 and
Harlan C. Amstutz, MD2
1 Department of Orthopaedics, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman
Drive, Department 630, La Jolla, CA 92093
2 Joint Replacement Institute, Orthopaedic Hospital, 2400 South Flower Street,
Los Angeles, CA 90007. E-mail address for H.C. Amstutz:
hamstutz{at}laoh.ucla.edu
Investigation performed at the Joint Replacement Institute at
Orthopaedic Hospital, Los Angeles, California
Disclosure: In support of their research for or preparation of this
work, one or more of the authors received, in any one year, outside funding or
grants in excess of $10,000 from Wright Medical Technology. In addition, one
or more of the authors or a member of his or her immediate family received, in
any one year, payments or other benefits in excess of $10,000 or a commitment
or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity (Wright Medical
Technology). Also, a commercial entity (Wright Medical Technology) paid or
directed in any one year, or agreed to pay or direct, benefits in excess of
$10,000 to a research fund, foundation, division, center, clinical practice,
or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors, or a
member of their immediate families, are affiliated or associated.
Background: A theoretical advantage of resurfacing arthroplasty of
the hip is that a failed femoral component can be safely and successfully
revised to a total hip arthroplasty. To our knowledge, this advantage has not
been demonstrated to date.
Methods: Twenty-one metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasties in
twenty patients with an average age of 50.2 years were converted to a
conventional stemmed total hip arthroplasty because of femoral component
failure. In eighteen hips, the acetabular component was retained, and in three
hips both components were revised. The results in the resurfacing conversion
group were compared with those in a group of fifty-eight patients who had
undergone sixty-four primary total hip arthroplasties that had been performed
during the same time-period by the same surgeon. Clinical evaluations (the
Harris hip score, the University of California at Los Angeles pain, walking,
and activity scores and the Short Form-12 score) and radiographic evaluations
were performed. The average duration of follow-up was forty-six months for the
conversion arthroplasty group and fifty-seven months for the primary
conventional total hip arthroplasty group.
Results: There was no significant difference between the conversion
arthroplasty group and the conventional arthroplasty group with regard to
operative time, blood loss, or complication rates. At the time of the most
recent follow-up, with the numbers studied, there were no significant
differences between the two groups with regard to the mean Harris hip score;
the University of California at Los Angeles pain, walking, and activity score;
or the SF-12 score. As assessed radiographically, the quality of component
fixation and the alignment of the reconstruction were equivalent between the
two groups. There had been no instances of aseptic loosening of the femoral or
the acetabular component in either group, and there had been no dislocations
after conversion of a resurfacing arthroplasty.
Conclusions: Conversion of a hip resurfacing with a femoral-side
failure to a total hip arthroplasty appears to be comparable with primary
total hip arthroplasty in terms of surgical effort, safety, and early clinical
outcomes.
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See
Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Facebook Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Zustin, M. Krause, S. Breer, M. Hahn, C. von Domarus, W. Ruther, G. Sauter, M. M. Morlock, and M. Amling
Morphologic Analysis of Periprosthetic Fractures After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
February 1, 2010;
92(2):
404 - 410.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. P. Vail, M. A. Mont, M. S. McGrath, M. G. Zywiel, P. E. Beaule, and W. N. Capello
Hip Resurfacing: Patient and Treatment Options
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
August 1, 2009;
91(Supplement_5):
2 - 4.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. C. Clohisy, P. E. Beaule, A. O'Malley, M. R. Safran, and P. Schoenecker
AOA Symposium. Hip Disease in the Young Adult: Current Concepts of Etiology and Surgical Treatment
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
October 1, 2008;
90(10):
2267 - 2281.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. H. Huo, J. Parvizi, B. S. Bal, and M. A. Mont
What's New in Total Hip Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
September 1, 2008;
90(9):
2043 - 2055.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Mont and T. P. Schmalzried
Modern Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing: Important Observations from the First Ten Years
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
August 1, 2008;
90(Supplement_3):
3 - 11.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. C. Amstutz, M. J. Le Duff, N. Harvey, and M. Hoberg
Improved Survivorship of Hybrid Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing with Second-Generation Techniques for Crowe-I and II Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
August 1, 2008;
90(Supplement_3):
12 - 20.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. S. McGrath, D. R. Desser, S. D. Ulrich, T. M. Seyler, D. R. Marker, and M. A. Mont
Total Hip Resurfacing in Patients Who Are Sixty Years of Age or Older
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
August 1, 2008;
90(Supplement_3):
27 - 31.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. P. Gross and F. Liu
Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing with an Uncemented Femoral Component. A Seven-Year Follow-up Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
August 1, 2008;
90(Supplement_3):
32 - 37.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Mont, M. S. McGrath, S. D. Ulrich, T. M. Seyler, D. R. Marker, and R. E. Delanois
Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty in the Presence of Extra-Articular Deformities or Implants
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
August 1, 2008;
90(Supplement_3):
45 - 51.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Shimmin, P. E. Beaule, and P. Campbell
Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
March 1, 2008;
90(3):
637 - 654.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Letters to the Editor:
Read all Letters to the Editor
- Revising Femoral-Side Surface Replacement Failures
- Shearwood J. McClelland, MD, MPH, FACS
- JBJS Online, 2 May 2007
[Full text]
|