The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2007;89:68-79.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.01047
© 2007 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Proximal Femoral Allograft Treatment of Vancouver Type-B3 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures After Total Hip ArthroplastySurgical Technique
Catherine F. Kellett, BSc(Hons), BM, BCh, FRCS(Tr&Orth)1,
Petros J. Boscainos, MD1,
Anthony C. Maury, MSc, FRCS(Tr&Orth)1,
Ari Pressman, MD, FRCSC1,
Barry Cayen, MD1,
Paul Zalzal, MD, FRCSC1,
David Backstein, MD, FRCSC1 and
Allan Gross, MD, FRCSC, O.Ont.1
1 Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Avenue, Suite 476A, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5,
Canada. E-mail address for A. Gross:
allan.gross{at}utoronto.ca
Investigation performed at Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario,
Canada
The original scientific article in which the surgical technique was
presented was published in JBJS Vol. 88-A, pp.
953-958, May 2006
DISCLOSURE: The authors did not receive any outside funding or grants in
support of their research for or preparation of this work. Neither they nor a
member of their immediate families received payments or other benefits or a
commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No
commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits
to any research fund, foundation, division, center, clinical practice, or
other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors, or a member
of their immediate families, are affiliated or associated.
The line drawings in this article are the work of Jennifer Fairman
(jfairman{at}fairmanstudios.com).
BACKGROUND:
Periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty are
becoming more prevalent. When a fracture occurs in a femur with substantial
proximal bone deficiency, the surgical options for revision are limited. One
option includes the use of a proximal femoral allograft.
METHODS:
We retrospectively assessed the results and complications of the use of a
proximal femoral allograft to treat twenty-five Vancouver type-B3
periprosthetic fractures in twenty-four patients. The mean duration of
follow-up was 5.1 years. Clinical results were graded with use of the Harris
hip score. Radiographs were assessed for evidence of trochanteric union,
host-allograft union, allograft resorption, and component loosening or
fracture. Failure of the procedure was defined as the need for revision
surgery requiring graft removal.
RESULTS:
The mean postoperative Harris hip score was 70.8. At the time of the final
follow-up, twenty-one of the twenty-four patients reported no or mild pain and
twenty-three patients were able to walk; fifteen required a walking aid. The
greater trochanter united in seventeen of the twenty-five hips (68%), and
osseous union of the allograft to the host femur occurred in twenty hips
(80%). There was mild graft resorption in four hips and moderate graft
resorption in two. Four (16%) of the twenty-five hips required repeat
revision.
CONCLUSIONS:
The use of a proximal femoral allograft for the treatment of a Vancouver
type-B3 periprosthetic femoral fracture can provide a satisfactory
result in terms of pain relief and function at five years.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
Related articles in JBJS:
- Proximal Femoral Allograft Treatment of Vancouver Type-B3 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures After Total Hip Arthroplasty
- Anthony C. Maury, Ari Pressman, Barry Cayen, Paul Zalzal, David Backstein, and Allan Gross
JBJS 2006 88: 953-958.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|