The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2007;89:418-426.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.00362
© 2007 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Institutional Review Board Approval: Why It Matters
Javad Parvizi, MD, FRCS1,
T. David Tarity, BS1,
Kyle Conner, MA2 and
J. Bruce Smith, MD2
1 Rothman Institute of Orthopedics at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 925
Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107. E-mail address for J. Parvizi:
parvj{at}aol.com
2 Thomas Jefferson University, Office of Human Research, Division of Human
Subjects Protection, Philadelphia, PA 19107
Investigation performed at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
Disclosure: The authors did not receive any outside funding or
grants in support of their research for or preparation of this work. Neither
they nor a member of their immediate families received payments or other
benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a
commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or
direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division, center,
clinical practice, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which
the authors, or a member of their immediate families, are affiliated or
associated.
The modern institutional review boards originated in the 1970s. They exist
to protect human subjects participating in research from potential harm.
The Belmont Report provided the ethical principles (respect for persons,
beneficence, and justice) that should be observed while conducting research on
human subjects.
Compliance with the ethical principles of the Belmont Report is a first
step in successful submissions to an institutional review board.
Regulations regarding conflict of interest represent an attempt to ensure
that research is not biased by financial or other interest and to maintain
public trust.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
|