The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2007;89:376-380.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.00437
© 2007 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the activities for this article:
 Spine Test 11: Spring 2007 (publication date May 15, 2007; expiration date ...
CME 1: January, February, March 2007 (publication date April 5, 2007; expir...
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Riew, K. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Riew, K. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Spine
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Prevalence of Cervical Spine Stenosis

Anatomic Study in Cadavers

Michael J. Lee, MD1, Ezequiel H. Cassinelli, MD2 and K. Daniel Riew, MD3

1 217 Greenbriar Court, Euclid, OH 44143
2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106-5043
3 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, One Barnes-Jewish Hospital Plaza, Suite 11300 West Pavilion, St. Louis, MO 63110

Investigation performed at the Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, and Barnes-Jewish Hospital at Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri

Disclosure: The authors did not receive any outside funding or grants in support of their research for or preparation of this work. Neither they nor a member of their immediate families received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division, center, clinical practice, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors, or a member of their immediate families, are affiliated or associated.

Background: The sagittal diameter of the cervical spinal canal is of clinical importance in traumatic, degenerative, and inflammatory conditions. A small canal diameter has been associated with an increased risk of injury; however, there is a lack of reliable normative data on spinal canal diameters in different age groups in the United States population. The purpose of this study was to use direct measurement of skeletal specimens to determine the spectrum of the sagittal diameters of the cervical spinal canal, the frequency of cervical stenosis in the general population, and the prevalence of cervical stenosis for different age groups, races, and sexes.

Methods: Four hundred and sixty-nine adult skeletal specimens of the cervical spine were obtained from the Hamann-Todd Collection in the Cleveland Museum of Natural History. With use of digital calipers, the distance from the posteriormost aspect of the vertebral body to the anteriormost aspect of the spinolaminar structure was measured and recorded for each specimen at every level from C3 to C7. Cervical stenosis was defined as a canal diameter of <12 mm. We analyzed the direct measurements and then assessed those data after correcting for size increases in the current population compared with the Hamann-Todd Collection. Finally, we analyzed the data after both that size correction and adjustment for radiographic magnification.

Results: The average anterior-posterior canal diameter (and standard deviation) in all specimens at all levels was 14.1 ± 1.6 mm. The canal diameters ranged from 9.0 to 20.9 mm, with a median diameter of 14.4 mm. Men had significantly larger cervical spinal canals than women at all of the levels that were evaluated. Specimens from donors who were sixty years of age or more at the time of death had significantly narrower canals than specimens from younger donors. There were no significant differences, with the numbers available, between black and white groups. After correcting for increased body size and adjusting for radiographic magnification, we estimated that cervical stenosis was present in 4.9% of the adult population, 6.8% of the population fifty years of age or older, and 9% of the population seventy years of age or older.

Conclusions: Cervical spine stenosis appears to be very common. The radiographic finding of cervical stenosis should therefore be correlated with the clinical presentation prior to decision-making regarding treatment.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?