The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2007;89:287-291.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.00136
© 2007 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Antibiotic Dosing Before Primary Hip and Knee Replacement as a Pay-for-Performance Measure
Timothy Bhattacharyya, MD1 and
David C. Hooper, MD1
1 Partners Orthopaedic Trauma Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit
Street, Yawkey 3600, Boston, MA 02118
Investigation performed at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston,
Massachusetts
A commentary is available with the electronic versions of this article,
on our web site
(www.jbjs.org)
and on our quarterly CD-ROM (call our subscription department, at
781-449-9780, to order the CD-ROM).
Disclosure: The authors did not receive any outside funding or
grants in support of their research for or preparation of this work. Neither
they nor a member of their immediate families received payments or other
benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a
commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or
direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division, center,
clinical practice, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which
the authors, or a member of their immediate families, are affiliated or
associated.
Background: There is a trend toward linking the reimbursement for
health care services to clinical outcome. One such pay-for-performance
proposal that affects orthopaedic surgeons is linking reimbursement for hip
and knee replacements to measures such as the percentage of patients receiving
antibiotics before surgery. We analyzed the risk factors associated with
failing to optimally administer preoperative antibiotics before primary hip
and knee arthroplasty.
Methods: Data on 988 elective primary total hip and knee
replacements done at one institution were collected. Multivariate analysis was
performed to determine clinical factors associated with administration of
antibiotics outside the recommended window (within one hour before the
incision).
Results: Thirteen percent of the patients did not receive optimal
antibiotic therapy (within the one-hour window prior to the elective
arthroplasty). Five patients (0.5%) received no documented preoperative
antibiotics. Patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty were more likely to
receive antibiotics outside the one-hour window than were patients undergoing
total knee arthroplasty. Longer induction times were associated with
administration of antibiotics outside the one-hour window. Certain individual
surgeons and anesthesiologists were more likely to administer antibiotics on
time. The anesthesiologist effect was more significant than the surgeon
effect.
Conclusions: Approximately 13% of the patients did not receive
optimal antibiotic therapy before total hip and knee replacement. Surgeons can
improve their performance score for this measure by focusing antibiotic
strategies on patients receiving a hip replacement and on complex cases, by
developing systems for antibiotic dosing with the anesthesia team, and by
improving documentation.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Facebook Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. D. Rosenberg, D. Wambold, L. Kraemer, M. Begley-Keyes, S. L. Zuckerman, N. Singh, M. M. Cohen, and M. V. Bennett
Ensuring Appropriate Timing of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
February 1, 2008;
90(2):
226 - 232.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|