The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2007;89:282-286.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00205
© 2007 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Manipulation After Total Knee Arthroplasty
E. Michael Keating, MD1,
Merrill A. Ritter, MD1,
Leesa D. Harty, BA1,
Gail Haas, OPA-C1,
John B. Meding, MD1,
Philip M. Faris, MD1 and
Michael E. Berend, MD1
1 Center for Hip and Knee Surgery, St. Francis Hospital, 1199 Hadley Road,
Mooresville, IN 46158. E-mail address for M.A. Ritter:
marittermd{at}yahoo.com
Investigation performed at the Center for Hip and Knee Surgery, St.
Francis Hospital, Mooresville, Indiana
Disclosure: The authors did not receive any outside funding or
grants in support of their research for or preparation of this work. Neither
they nor a member of their immediate families received payments or other
benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a
commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or
direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division, center,
clinical practice, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which
the authors, or a member of their immediate families, are affiliated or
associated.
Background: Following total knee arthroplasty, some patients who
fail to achieve >90° of flexion in the early perioperative period may
be considered candidates for manipulation of the knee under anesthesia. The
purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes of manipulation following
total knee arthroplasty.
Methods: One hundred and thirteen knees in ninety patients underwent
manipulation for postoperative flexion of 90° at a mean of ten weeks
after surgery. Flexion was measured with a goniometer prior to total knee
arthroplasty, at the conclusion of the operative procedure, before
manipulation, immediately after manipulation, at six months, and at one,
three, and five years postoperatively.
Results: Eighty-one (90%) of the ninety patients achieved
improvement of ultimate knee flexion following manipulation. The average
flexion was 102° prior to total knee arthroplasty, 111° following skin
closure, and 70° before manipulation. The average improvement in flexion
from the measurement made before manipulation to that recorded at the
five-year follow-up was 35° (p < 0.0001, paired t test). There was no
significant difference in the mean improvement in flexion when patients who
had manipulation within twelve weeks postoperatively were compared with those
who had manipulation more than twelve weeks postoperatively. Patients who
eventually underwent manipulation had significantly lower preoperative Knee
Society pain scores (more pain) than those who had not had manipulation (p =
0.0027).
Conclusions: Manipulation generally increases ultimate flexion
following total knee arthroplasty. Patients with severe preoperative pain are
more likely to require manipulation.
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See
Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. M. Seyler, D. R. Marker, A. Bhave, J. F. Plate, G. A. Marulanda, P. M. Bonutti, R. E. Delanois, and M. A. Mont
Functional Problems and Arthrofibrosis Following Total Knee Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
October 1, 2007;
89(suppl_3):
59 - 69.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|