The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2007;89:2658-2662.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.01538
© 2007 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the exams for this article:
Adult Hip Reconstruction Test 27: Winter 2008 (publication date February 15...
CME 4: October, November, December 2007 (publication date January 4, 2008; ...
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhattacharyya, T.
Right arrow Articles by Malchau, H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bhattacharyya, T.
Right arrow Articles by Malchau, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Adult Hip
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Mortality After Periprosthetic Fracture of the Femur

Timothy Bhattacharyya, MD1, Denis Chang, BA1, James B. Meigs, MD2, Daniel M. Estok, II, MD3 and Henrik Malchau, MD1

1 Partners Orthopaedic Trauma Service, Yawkey 3600 (T.B. and D.C.), Department of Medicine, (J.B.M.), and Department of Orthopaedics, GRJ 1126 (H.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02118
2 General Medical Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Staniford Street, 9th Floor, Boston, MA 02114
3 Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02114
Investigation performed at the Partners Orthopaedic Trauma Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

Disclosure: The authors did not receive any outside funding or grants in support of their research for or preparation of this work. Neither they nor a member of their immediate families received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division, center, clinical practice, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors, or a member of their immediate families, are affiliated or associated.


Background: Management of periprosthetic femoral fractures is often complex, and few studies have documented its associated mortality.

Methods: We retrospectively identified from our trauma and surgical registries 106 patients who underwent surgery for a periprosthetic femoral fracture. We then identified a contemporaneous age and sex-matched control cohort of 309 patients who had a hip fracture (femoral neck or intertrochanteric) and 311 patients who underwent primary hip or knee replacement. Mortality at one year was identified with use of the Social Security database.

Results: Twelve (11%) of 106 patients died within one year following surgical treatment of a periprosthetic fracture. During the same follow-up period, fifty-one (16.5%) of 309 patients died following surgery for a hip fracture and nine (2.9%) of 311 patients died following primary joint replacement. The mortality rate after a periprosthetic femoral fracture was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) compared with that for matched patients who had undergone primary joint replacement, and it was similar to the mortality rate after a hip fracture. For periprosthetic fractures, a delay of greater than two days from admission to the time of surgery was associated with an increased mortality rate at one year (p < 0.0007). Forty-nine patients underwent revision arthroplasty for the treatment of a Vancouver type-B periprosthetic fracture, and six (12%) died. In contrast, twenty-four patients with a Vancouver type-B periprosthetic fracture were treated with open reduction and internal fixation and eight (33%) died. The difference was significant (p < 0.03).

Conclusions: The mortality rate within one year following surgical treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures is high and is similar to that after treatment for hip fractures. Because revision arthroplasty for the treatment of type-B periprosthetic fractures was associated with a one-year mortality rate that was significantly less than that after surgical treatment with open reduction and internal fixation, in instances when either treatment option is feasible, revision arthroplasty may be the preferred option.

Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?