This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) CME: Take the exams for this article: Adult Hip Reconstruction Test 27: Winter 2008 (publication date February 15... CME 4: October, November, December 2007 (publication date January 4, 2008; ... [Supplementary Material] Letters to the Editor: Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My File Cabinet Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Google Scholar Articles by Parvizi, J. Articles by Hozack, W. J. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Parvizi, J. Articles by Hozack, W. J. Related Collections Adult Hip Social Bookmarking             What's this?

Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in Octogenarians

A Case-Control Study

¹ Rothman Institute, 925 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107. E-mail address for J. Parvizi: Parvj{at}aol.com
Investigation performed at the Rothman Institute of Orthopedics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Disclosure: In support of their research for or preparation of this manuscript, one or more of the authors received, in any one year, outside funding or grants in excess of $10,000 from Stryker. Neither they nor a member of their immediate families received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division, center, clinical practice, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors, or a member of their immediate families, are affiliated or associated.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the results of 170 revision total hip arthroplasties that had been performed in 159 octogenarians in our institute between 1992 and 1999. The mean patient age at the time of surgery was 83.8 years, and the mean follow-up time was 6.8 years. We then compared these results with those of 170 revision total hip arthroplasties, done with the same surgical technique and prosthesis, in 162 patients who were seventy years old or younger and followed for a mean of six years. The functional outcome and the quality of life following the arthroplasties were assessed with use of the Harris hip score and the Short Form-36 (SF-36), respectively. Risk factors for complications and mortality were identified, and Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine survivorship.

Results: The octogenarians had a significant improvement in the mean Harris hip score, from 47 points preoperatively to 85 points at the time of the latest follow-up. In the control group, the Harris hip score also improved significantly, from a preoperative mean of 44.3 points to a mean of 87.9 points at the time of the latest follow-up. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the magnitude of improvement of the Harris hip score. There were 100 deaths (a rate of 58.8%) at a mean of 5.3 years postoperatively in the octogenarian group compared with twelve deaths (7.1%) in the control group (p < 0.0001). There were no intraoperative deaths in either group. Of the 100 octogenarian patients who died, 94% had a well-functioning hip at the time of death. Perioperative medical complications developed in thirty patients (thirty-eight hips [22.4%]) in the octogenarian group and in twenty-five patients (twenty-six hips [15.3%]) in the control group (p > 0.05). There were thirteen repeat revisions and four other types of reoperations in the octogenarian group and twenty-three repeat revisions and six other types of reoperations in the control group (p = 0.08). A dislocation was sustained by four patients in the octogenarian group and sixteen patients in the control group (p = 0.01).

Conclusions: Revision total hip arthroplasty can provide substantial clinical benefit to patients over eighty years of age. The medical complication rate for octogenarians may not differ significantly from that for patients seventy years of age or younger, and the prevalence of technical complications and dislocations can be expected to be lower than that for younger patients.

Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Technorati    What's this?

Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press (TM) assists in the publication of JBJS Online.
Copyright © 2007 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. Online ISSN: 1535-1386.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery®, JBJS®, JB&JS®, and eJBJS® are registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.