The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2007;89:2260-2265.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.G.00111
© 2007 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Clavicular Anatomy and the Applicability of Precontoured Plates
Jerry I. Huang, MD1,
Paul Toogood, BS1,
Michael R. Chen, MD1,
John H. Wilber, MD1 and
Daniel R. Cooperman, MD1
1 Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case
Western Reserve University, 645 Hannah House, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland,
OH 44106. E-mail address for J.I. Huang:
orthojerr{at}yahoo.com
Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, University
Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland,
Ohio
Disclosure: In support of their research for or preparation of this
work, one or more of the authors received, in any one year, outside funding or
grants of less than $10,000 from the AO North America Resident Trauma Research
Grant. Neither they nor a member of their immediate families received payments
or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a
commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or
direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division, center,
clinical practice, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which
the authors, or a member of their immediate families, are affiliated or
associated.
Background: Plate fixation of clavicular fractures is technically
difficult because of the complex anatomy of the bone, with an S-shaped
curvature and a cephalad-to-caudad bow. The purpose of the present study was
to characterize variations in clavicular anatomy and to determine the clinical
applicability of an anatomic precontoured clavicular plate designed for
fracture fixation.
Methods: One hundred pairs of clavicles were analyzed. The location
and magnitude of the superior clavicular bow were determined with use of a
digitizer and modeling software. Axial radiographs were made of each clavicle
and the precontoured Acumed Locking Clavicle Plate, which is designed to be
applied superiorly. With use of Adobe Photoshop technology, the plates were
freely translated and rotated along each clavicle to determine the quality of
fit and the location of the "best fit."
Results: The location of the maximum superior bow was lateral, with
a mean distance of 37.2 ± 18.4 mm from the acromial articulation and
with a mean magnitude of 5.1 ± 5.9 mm. There was no significant
difference in the location or magnitude of the apex of the bow between
specimens from male and female donors. The anatomic precontoured clavicular
plate had the best fit in specimens from black male donors and the worst fit
in specimens from white female donors, with a poor fit being seen in 38%
(nineteen) of the fifty specimensfrom white female donors. The best location
for superior plate application was along the medial aspect of the
clavicle.
Conclusions: The apex of the superior bow of the clavicle is
typically located along the lateral aspect of the bone, whereas the medial
aspect of the superior surface of the clavicle remains relatively flat, making
it an ideal plating surface. The precontoured anatomic clavicular plate
appears to fit the S-shaped curvature on the superior surface of the majority
of clavicles in male patients but may not be as conforming in white female
patients. While this plate fits in the medial three-fifths of the clavicle, it
does not fit as well laterally.
Clinical Relevance: Recent studies have shown that displaced
midshaft clavicular fractures that are treated with plate fixation have better
functional outcomes than those that are treated nonoperatively. An
understanding of clavicular anatomy is paramount for optimal plate design and
fracture fixation. Our data provide potentially important information for
future clavicular plate designs and applications.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
|