The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2007;89:2225-2232.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.00958
© 2007 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the activities for this article:
 Foot/Ankle Test 10: Winter 2008 (publication date February 15, 2008; expira...
CME 4: October, November, December 2007 (publication date January 4, 2008; ...
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaar, S.
Right arrow Articles by Morag, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaar, S.
Right arrow Articles by Morag, Y.
Related Collections
Right arrow Foot/Ankle
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Lisfranc Joint Displacement Following Sequential Ligament Sectioning

Scott Kaar, MD1, John Femino, MD2 and Yoav Morag, MD3

1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Taubman Center 2914, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0328. E-mail address: skaar{at}med.umich.edu
2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Drive, 01016 JPP, Iowa City, IA 52242-1088
3 Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Taubman Center, Ann Arbor, MI 48109

Investigation performed at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Disclosure: The authors did not receive any outside funding or grants in support of their research for or preparation of this work. Neither they nor a member of their immediate families received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division, center, clinical practice, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors, or a member of their immediate families, are affiliated or associated.

Background: There are two primary radiographic patterns of Lisfranc instability, transverse and longitudinal. There is no single diagnostic method with which to consistently confirm the diagnosis of an unstable injury. Our purpose was to define which ligament disruptions produce these two injury patterns and to compare the utility of weight-bearing and stress radiographs for detecting each pattern of instability.

Methods: Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric lower extremities were dissected to expose the dorsal aspect of the midfoot. Radiographic markers were placed at the base of the second metatarsal and the distal borders of the first and second cuneiforms. The specimens underwent sectioning of the interosseous first cuneiform-second metatarsal (Lisfranc) ligament and were then divided into two groups. The transverse group underwent sectioning of the plantar ligament between the first cuneiform and the second and third metatarsals at the plantar aspect of the second cuneiform-second metatarsal joint, whereas the longitudinal group underwent sectioning of the interosseous ligament between the first and second cuneiforms. Weight-bearing, adduction, and abduction stress radiographs were made before and after each ligament was sectioned. The radiographs were digitized, and displacement was recorded. Instability was defined as ≥2 mm of displacement.

Results: Weight-bearing radiographs made after the Lisfranc (first cuneiform-second metatarsal) ligament alone was sectioned were diagnostic (showed instability) for one of ten specimens. Abduction stress radiographs were diagnostic for two of five specimens, and adduction stress radiographs were diagnostic for zero of five specimens. In the transverse group (sectioning of the plantar ligament between the first cuneiform and the second and third metatarsals), weight-bearing radiographs were diagnostic on the basis of first cuneiform-second metatarsal displacement for one of five specimens but were not diagnostic on the basis of second cuneiform-second metatarsal displacement for any of five specimens. Abduction stress radiographs were diagnostic on the basis of displacement of both the first cuneiform-second metatarsal and the second cuneiform-second metatarsal joints for five of five specimens. In the longitudinal group (sectioning of the interosseous ligament between the first and second cuneiforms), weight-bearing radiographs were diagnostic on the basis of first cuneiform-second metatarsal displacement for one of five specimens and were diagnostic on the basis of displacement between the first and second cuneiforms for one of five specimens. Adduction stress radiographs were diagnostic on the basis of first cuneiform-second metatarsal displacement for one of five specimens and were diagnostic on the basis of displacement between the first and second cuneiforms for four of five specimens.

Conclusions: Transverse instability required sectioning of both the interosseous first cuneiform-second metatarsal ligament and the plantar ligament between the first cuneiform and the second and third metatarsals. Longitudinal instability required sectioning of both the interosseous first cuneiform-second metatarsal ligament and the interosseous ligament between the first and second cuneiforms. Compared with weight-bearing radiographs, injury-specific manual stress radiographs showed qualitatively greater displacement when used to evaluate both patterns of instability.

Clinical Relevance: We recommend further evaluation of the effectiveness of making injury-specific manual stress radiographs with fluoroscopy for patients with suspected Lisfranc instability to determine both the presence of instability and its pattern.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
P. M. Lafferty, W. Min, and N. C. Tejwani
Stress Radiographs in Orthopaedic Surgery
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., August 1, 2009; 17(8): 528 - 539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
S. M. Raikin, I. Elias, S. Dheer, M. P. Besser, W. B. Morrison, and A. C. Zoga
Prediction of Midfoot Instability in the Subtle Lisfranc Injury. Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Intraoperative Findings
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2009; 91(4): 892 - 899.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
R. C. Marx and M. S. Mizel
What's New in Foot and Ankle Surgery
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2009; 91(4): 1023 - 1031.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Ultrasound MedHome page
S. Woodward, J. A. Jacobson, J. E. Femino, Y. Morag, D. P. Fessell, and Q. Dong
Sonographic Evaluation of Lisfranc Ligament Injuries
J. Ultrasound Med., March 1, 2009; 28(3): 351 - 357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]