The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2007;89:2195-2203.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.01223
© 2007 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
The Effect of Stuffing the Patellofemoral Compartment on the Outcome of Total Knee Arthroplasty
Jeffery L. Pierson, MD1,
Merrill A. Ritter, MD2,
E. Michael Keating, MD2,
Philip M. Faris, MD2,
John B. Meding, MD2,
Michael E. Berend, MD2 and
Kenneth E. Davis, MS2
1 Joint Replacement Surgeons of Indiana, St. Vincent Center for Joint
Replacement, 8402 Harcourt Road, Indianapolis, IN 46260. E-mail address:
jlpierso{at}stvincent.org
2 Joint Replacement Surgeons of Indiana Research Foundation, Center for Hip and
Knee Surgery; St. Francis Hospital Mooresville, 1201 Hadley Road, Mooresville,
IN 46158
Investigation performed at the Center for Hip and Knee Surgery, St.
Francis Hospital, Mooresville, Indiana, and the Center for Joint Replacement,
St. Vincent Hospital, Indianapolis, Indiana
Disclosure: In support of their research for or preparation of this
work, one or more of the authors received, in any one year, outside funding or
grants in excess of $10,000 from Biomet. In addition, one or more of the
authors or a member of his or her immediate family received, in any one year,
payments or other benefits in excess of $10,000 or a commitment or agreement
to provide such benefits from a commercial entity (Biomet and Zimmer:
royalties, consulting). No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to
pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division,
center, clinical practice, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with
which the authors, or a member of their immediate families, are affiliated or
associated.
Background: The effect of so-called stuffing of the patellofemoral
compartment at the time of total knee arthroplasty (that is, increasing the
anterior patellar displacement, the anteroposterior femoral size, or the
combined anteroposterior patellofemoral size) has not been well studied. The
purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of stuffing the
patellofemoral compartment on the outcome of primary total knee
arthroplasty.
Methods: A retrospective review of 1100 primary total knee
arthroplasties that had been performed in 1997 and 1998 was conducted. Eight
hundred and thirty arthroplasties (75.5%) met the diagnostic and minimum
two-year follow-up criteria for inclusion in this report. Radiographic
measurements were made to determine preoperative and postoperative anterior
patellar displacement, anteroposterior femoral size, combined anteroposterior
patellofemoral size, anterior femoral offset, and posterior femoral offset.
Regression analysis was performed to determine the effects of changes in these
variables on the range of motion, the Knee Society Knee Score, the Knee
Society Function Score, the Knee Society Pain Score, and the rate of lateral
retinacular release.
Results: Preoperative to postoperative changes in anterior patellar
displacement, anteroposterior femoral size, combined anteroposterior
patellofemoral size, anterior femoral offset, and posterior femoral offset had
no clinically meaningful effect on the range of motion of the knee or on any
of the Knee Society scores. Increases in anterior patellar displacement were
associated with a lower probability of the need for a lateral retinacular
release. Increases in measured anteroposterior femoral size were associated
with a higher probability of the need for lateral release. Even when combined,
however, these relationships explained only 10.1% of the observed variance in
the need for lateral retinacular release. Moreover, analyses indicated that
patient gender, large as opposed to medium patellar size, and absolute femoral
component size influenced the likelihood of lateral release more than did
anterior patellar displacement and measured anteroposterior femoral size.
Conclusions: Our findings do not support the widely held belief that
stuffing of the patellofemoral joint results in adverse outcomes after total
knee arthroplasty. Furthermore, the need for lateral release appears to be
multifactorial and likely involves a more complex set of factors. Thus,
without evidence of other identifiable causes of failure, we do not recommend
revision for the treatment of pain of an overstuffed knee joint.
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See
Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Facebook Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. K. Fehring, S. M. Odum, J. Hughes, B. D. Springer, and W. B. Beaver Jr.
Differences Between the Sexes in the Anatomy of the Anterior Condyle of the Knee
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
October 1, 2009;
91(10):
2335 - 2341.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. A. Deirmengian and J. H. Lonner
What's New in Adult Reconstructive Knee Surgery
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
November 1, 2008;
90(11):
2556 - 2565.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Letters to the Editor:
Read all Letters to the Editor
- The Effect of Stuffing the Patellofemoral Compartment on the Outcome of Total Knee Arthroplasty
- SIDDHARTH YADAV
- JBJS Online, 28 Jan 2008
[Full text]
- Dr. Pierson et al. respond to Dr. Yadav
- Jeffrey L. Pierson, M.D., et al.
- JBJS Online, 6 Feb 2008
[Full text]
|