The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2007;89:1-10.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.00020
© 2007 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Nonoperative Treatment Compared with Plate Fixation of Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures
A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial
Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society
Disclosure: In support of their research for or preparation of this
manuscript, one or more of the authors received grants or outside funding from
the Orthopaedic Trauma Association and Zimmer Inc. None of the authors
received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide
such benefits from a commercial entity. A commercial entity (Zimmer Inc.) paid
or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, benefits to a research fund,
foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit
organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.
NOTE: The authors acknowledge the advice and knowledge of Lynn
A. Crosby and Carl J. Basamania.
This manuscript was prepared by the Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society,
c/o Michael D. McKee, MD, FRCS(C), 55 Queen Street East, Suite 800, Toronto,
ON M5C 1R6, Canada. E-mail address:
mckeem{at}smh.toronto.on.ca
Principal Investigator: Michael D. McKee
Lead Investigators (Site): Michael D. McKee (St. Michael's
Hospital), Hans J. Kreder (Sunny-brook and Women's Health Science Center),
Scott Mandel (McMaster University), Robert Mc-Cormack (Royal Columbian
Hospital), Rudolph Reindl (Montreal General Hospital), David M.W. Pugh
(Brantford Hospital), David Sanders (London Health Science Center), and
Richard Buckley (Foothills Hospital). Study Design: Michael D. McKee,
Emil H. Schemitsch, Lisa M. Wild, Hans J. Kreder, Robert McCormack, Scott
Mandel, Rudolph Reindl, and Edward Harvey. Data Analysis: Jeremy A.
Hall, Lisa M. Wild, Milena V. Santos, Michael D. McKee, Christian J.
Veillette, and Daniel B. Whelan. Radiographic Analysis: Lisa M. Wild,
Milena V. Santos, and Michael D. McKee. Manuscript Preparation:
Michael D. McKee, Jeremy A. Hall, Lisa M. Wild, Emil H. Schemitsch, Rudolph
Reindl, Robert McCormack, David Sanders, and Christian J. Veillette.
Patient Enrollment and Assessment: Michael D. McKee, Emil H.
Schemitsch, James P. Waddell, Lisa M. Wild, Milena V. Santos, Hans J. Kreder,
David J.G. Stephen, Terrence A. Axelrod, Edward Harvey, Rudolph Reindl,
Gregory Berry, Bertrand Perey, Kostas Panagiotopolous, Robert McCormack,
Beverly Bulmer, Mauri Zomar, Karyn Moon, Elizabeth Kimmel, Carla Erho, Elena
Lakoub, Patricia Leclair, Christian J. Veillette, Bonnie Sobchak, David M.W.
Pugh, Richard Buckley, Scott Mandel, David Sanders, and Trevor B. Stone.
Background: Recent studies have shown a high prevalence of
symptomatic malunion and nonunion after nonoperative treatment of displaced
midshaft clavicular fractures. We sought to compare patient-oriented outcome
and complication rates following nonoperative treatment and those after plate
fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures.
Methods: In a multicenter, prospective clinical trial, 132 patients
with a displaced midshaft fracture of the clavicle were randomized (by sealed
envelope) to either operative treatment with plate fixation (sixty-seven
patients) or nonoperative treatment with a sling (sixty-five patients).
Outcome analysis included standard clinical follow-up and the Constant
shoulder score, the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, and
plain radiographs. One hundred and eleven patients (sixty-two managed
operatively and forty-nine managed nonoperatively) completed one year of
follow-up. There were no differences between the two groups with respect to
patient demographics, mechanism of injury, associated injuries, Injury
Severity Score, or fracture pattern.
Results: Constant shoulder scores and DASH scores were significantly
improved in the operative fixation group at all time-points (p = 0.001 and p
< 0.01, respectively). The mean time to radiographic union was 28.4 weeks
in the non-operative group compared with 16.4 weeks in the operative group (p
= 0.001). There were two nonunions in the operative group compared with seven
in the nonoperative group (p = 0.042). Symptomatic malunion developed in nine
patients in the nonoperative group and in none in the operative group (p =
0.001). Most complications in the operative group were hardware-related (five
patients had local irritation and/or prominence of the hardware, three had a
wound infection, and one had mechanical failure). At one year after the
injury, the patients in the operative group were more likely to be satisfied
with the appearance of the shoulder (p = 0.001) and with the shoulder in
general (p = 0.002) than were those in the nonoperative group.
Conclusions: Operative fixation of a displaced fracture of the
clavicular shaft results in improved functional outcome and a lower rate of
malunion and nonunion compared with nonoperative treatment at one year of
follow-up. Hardware removal remains the most common reason for repeat
intervention in the operative group. This study supports primary plate
fixation of completely displaced midshaft clavicular fractures in active adult
patients.
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions
to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
Related articles in JBJS:
- Nonoperative Treatment Compared with Plate Fixation of Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures. Surgical Technique
- Sahal A. Altamimi, Michael D. McKee, and the Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society
JBJS 2008 90: 1-8.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. L. Ramsey, C. L. Getz, and B. O. Parsons
What's New in Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
March 1, 2008;
90(3):
677 - 687.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. A. Altamimi, M. D. McKee, and the Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society
Nonoperative Treatment Compared with Plate Fixation of Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures. Surgical Technique
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
March 1, 2008;
90(Supplement_2__Part_1):
1 - 8.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. A. Cole, T. Miclau III, and M. Bhandari
What's New in Orthopaedic Trauma
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
November 1, 2007;
89(11):
2560 - 2577.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. I. Huang, P. Toogood, M. R. Chen, J. H. Wilber, and D. R. Cooperman
Clavicular Anatomy and the Applicability of Precontoured Plates
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
October 1, 2007;
89(10):
2260 - 2265.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. J. Jeray
Acute Midshaft Clavicular Fracture
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg.,
April 1, 2007;
15(4):
239 - 248.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Letters to the Editor:
Read all Letters to the Editor
- Not the last word
- Joseph Bernstein, M.D.
- JBJS Online, 12 Feb 2007
[Full text]
- Dr. McKee and The Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society respond to Dr. Bernstein
- Michael D McKee, M.D., et al.
- JBJS Online, 12 Feb 2007
[Full text]
- Treatment of Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures
- Shashank D. Chitgopkar, et al.
- JBJS Online, 12 Mar 2007
[Full text]
- Treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures
- Michael D. McKee, M.D., FRCS(C), et al.
- JBJS Online, 19 Mar 2007
[Full text]
- Primary fixation of displaced clavicle fractures: Unanswered Questions
- Paul J. Jenkins MBChB MRCS Ed, et al.
- JBJS Online, 27 Mar 2007
[Full text]
- Dr. McKee et al. respond to Dr. Jenkins
- Michael D. McKee, M.D., FRCS(C), et al.
- JBJS Online, 3 Apr 2007
[Full text]
- Midshaft clavicular fractures - are the included patients representative?
- Gunnar B. Flugsrud MD PhD
- JBJS Online, 2 Jul 2007
[Full text]
- Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures.
- Michael D. McKee
- JBJS Online, 27 Jun 2007
[Full text]
- Dr. McKee et al. respond to Dr. Flugsrud
- Michael D. McKee, M.D.(FRCS(C), et al.
- JBJS Online, 2 Jul 2007
[Full text]
|