The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2006;88:95-98.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.01328
© 2006 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Potential Biologic Therapies for the Intervertebral Disc
Christopher Evans, PhD, DSc
Corresponding author: Christopher Evans, PhD, DSc Center for Molecular
Orthopaedics, Harvard Medical School, 221 Longwood Avenue, BLI-152, Boston, MA
02115. E-mail address:
cevans{at}rics.bwh.harvard.edu
The author did not receive grants or outside funding in support of his
research for or preparation of this manuscript. The author received payments
or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a
commercial entity (Dr. Evans is on the scientific advisory board of TissueGene
Inc. and Orthogen AG). No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay
or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational
institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the
author is affiliated or associated.
Biology offers several strategies for restoring the degenerating disc,
including the use of recombinant or natural proteins that increase matrix
accumulation and assembly, enhance the number of disc cells, or in other ways
lead to restoration of the native healthy disc. Recombinant bone morphogenetic
protein-7 (osteogenic protein-1) shows promise in this regard. Other growth
factors, as well as cytokine antagonists such as the interleukin-1 receptor
antagonist, are also good candidates. Because disc degeneration is a chronic,
progressive disorder occurring over many years, it is likely that growth
factors and other therapeutic proteins will need to be present in the disc for
extended periods of time. The intradiscal injection of recombinant or natural
proteins is unlikely to fulfill this requirement. In this scenario, the
delivery of genes that encode the protein in question may provide a better
delivery system. Kang and associates have pioneered this strategy,
demonstrating the responsiveness of disc cells to in situ genetic
modification.
The success of protein and gene therapy requires the presence of an
adequate number of responding cells. Disc degeneration is accompanied by a
decline in cellularity. Restoring cell numbers could be achieved by either
stimulating the division and inhibiting the death of endogenous cells or by
introducing new cells into the disc. The latter strategy may be more
successful, especially if the endogenous cells of a degenerating disc are
unresponsive or otherwise abnormal. When pursuing this strategy, there are
several important reasons why it is better to introduce progenitor cells than
to attempt to harvest and reintroduce mature disc cells. Progenitor cells of
the mesenchymal lineage, available from bone marrow, fat, and other convenient
sources, could be useful. However, although the presumption exists that these
types of cells can differentiate into disc cells, this has never been
demonstrated. One impediment to confirming differentiation into a disc cell is
our inability to identify these cells; there are no robust molecular,
biochemical, or biologic markers. The serious study of disc-cell biology at
this level would be most rewarding.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
|