The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2006;88:3-9.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.01313
© 2006 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Lumbar Disc Degeneration: Epidemiology and Genetics
Michele C. Battié, PhD and
Tapio Videman, MD, DrMedSci
Corresponding author: Michele C. Battié, PhD Department of
Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, 2-50 Corbett Hall, Edmonton, AB T6G
2G4, Canada. E-mail address:
mc.battie{at}ualberta.ca
Grants supporting the authors' work referenced in this review came from the
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases and the
Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research. (No support was received for
preparing this paper.) None of the authors received payments or other benefits
or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial
entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any
benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other
charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or
associated.
Research conducted over the past decade has led to a dramatic shift in the
understanding of disc degeneration and its etiology. Previously, heavy
physical loadingoften associated with occupationwas the main
suspected risk factor for disc degeneration, which was commonly viewed as a
wear-and-tear phenomenon exacerbated by the precarious nutritional status of
the disc. However, results of studies on twins suggest that physical loading
specific to occupation and sport plays a relatively minor role in disc
degeneration. Recent research indicates that heredity has a dominant role in
disc degeneration, which would explain the variance of up to 74% seen in adult
populations that have been studied to date. Since 1998, genetic influences
have been confirmed by the identification of several gene forms associated
with disc degeneration. This research is paving the way for a better
understanding of the biologic mechanisms through which disc degeneration
occurs, including specific interactions between genes and environment.
Research into disc degeneration and genetics has become more limited by
phenotypes or definitions and measures of disc degeneration than by DNA
analysis. Standardized, universally accepted definitions of disc degeneration
are lacking, in part due to limited knowledge of the process. The measurements
that are selected depend on the method used to evaluate the disc and are often
qualitative ordinal rating scales, lacking in precision. Although it is
generally agreed that disc degeneration is common, the prevalence of specific
findings is unclear. A review of the epidemiology of disc degeneration reveals
wide-ranging prevalence estimates for various signs of disc degeneration in
samples of the general population and in patients with back symptoms. The
extreme variations in prevalence rates are likely largely due to
inconsistencies in the definitions and measurements of disc degeneration. Such
inconsistencies and inaccuracies impede epidemiologic research on disc
degeneration.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
F M K Williams, B S Kato, G Livshits, P N Sambrook, T D Spector, and A J MacGregor
Lumbar disc disease shows linkage to chromosome 19 overlapping with a QTL for hand OA
Ann Rheum Dis,
January 1, 2008;
67(1):
117 - 119.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|