The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2006;88:2035-2041.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00823
© 2006 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the activity for this article:
 Spine Test 10: Fall 2006 (publication...
Right arrow [Supplementary Material]
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JBJS
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Sign up for keyword alerts
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buchowski, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sponseller, P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buchowski, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sponseller, P. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Spine
Right arrow Pediatrics
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Temporary Internal Distraction as an Aid to Correction of Severe Scoliosis

Jacob M. Buchowski, MD, MS1, Rishi Bhatnagar, BS2, David L. Skaggs, MD3 and Paul D. Sponseller, MD2

1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8233, St. Louis, MO 63110
2 c/o Elaine P. Henze, Medical Editor, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, 4940 Eastern Avenue, #A672, Baltimore, MD 21224-2780. E-mail address for E.P. Henze: ehenze1{at}jhmi.edu
3 Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, 4650 Sunset Boulevard, #69, Los Angeles, CA 90027

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, and the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research for or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

Background: Halo traction is a well-recognized adjunct for correcting severe complex rigid scoliotic curves, but it is associated with complications and is contraindicated in the presence of fixed cervical instability, kyphosis, or stenosis. In addition, halo traction often requires prolonged hospital stays and is not welcomed by all families. These limitations led to consideration of temporary internal distraction as an alternative.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of children in whom severe scoliosis had been treated with temporary internal distraction. Our goals were to (1) assess whether the use of temporary internal distraction can aid in the correction of severe scoliosis and (2) identify complications associated with temporary internal distraction and compare them with those associated with halo traction. The mean preoperative curve was 104°. All patients underwent initial posterior release of the rigid portion of the spine (with six also having anterior release) and placement of spinal instrumentation under distraction during spinal cord monitoring. Of the ten patients, four had one distraction procedure (i.e., the initial surgery [or first distraction] followed by definitive fusion and the remaining six had two distraction procedures (i.e., the initial surgery [or first distraction] followed by the second distraction) followed by definitive fusion. After distraction, all patients underwent posterior spinal fusion with definitive dual-rod fixation. The amount of correction was determined by measuring the curve on plain radiographs made preoperatively, after each internal distraction procedure, after definitive fusion, and at the time of final follow-up.

Results: Curve correction after use of internal distraction, and before definitive fusion, averaged 53% (from 104° to 49°) (range, 39% [from 70° to 43°] to 79% [from 70° to 15°]). This method facilitated safe, gradual deformity correction in all ten patients. The mean time between the initial procedure and the definitive fusion was 2.4 weeks. The mean final curve correction was 80% (from 104° to 20°) (range, 73% [from 131° to 35°] to 91% [from 110° to 10°]). No neurologic deficits or infections resulted.

Conclusions: Temporary internal distraction is a viable alternative approach to maximizing curve correction in patients undergoing spinal fusion for severe scoliosis.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JBJS:

Temporary Internal Distraction as an Aid to Correction of Severe Scoliosis. Surgical Technique
Jacob M. Buchowski, David L. Skaggs, and Paul D. Sponseller
JBJS 2007 89: 297-309. [Abstract] [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JBJSHome page
J. M. Buchowski, D. L. Skaggs, and P. D. Sponseller
Temporary Internal Distraction as an Aid to Correction of Severe Scoliosis. Surgical Technique
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2007; 89(2_suppl_2): 297 - 309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]