The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2006;88:1952-1956.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00890
© 2006 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the activities for this article:
Adult Hip Reconstruction Test 21: Fall 2006 (publication date November 15, ...
CME 3: July, August, September 2006 (publication date October 5, 2006; expi...
Right arrow [Supplementary Material]
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haidukewych, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lewallen, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haidukewych, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lewallen, D. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Adult Hip
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Intraoperative Fractures of the Acetabulum During Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

George J. Haidukewych, MD1, David J. Jacofsky, MD2, Arlen D. Hanssen, MD2 and David G. Lewallen, MD2

1 Florida Orthopedic Institute, 13020 Telecom Parkway, Temple Terrace, FL 33637. E-mail address: docgjh{at}aol.com
2 Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street, S.W., Rochester, MN 55901

Investigation performed at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota

A commentary is available with the electronic versions of this article, on our web site (www.jbjs.org) and on our quarterly CD-ROM (call our subscription department, at 781-449-9780, to order the CD-ROM).

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research for or preparation of this manuscript. One or more of the authors received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity (implant royalty payments to Mayo Medical Ventures from Zimmer, Inc.). No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.


Background: The intraoperative occurrence of an acetabular fracture is a rare complication of primary total hip arthroplasty. Previous reports have lacked a sufficiently large number of subjects to allow for an analysis of the causes and appropriate treatment of this problem.

Methods: Between 1990 and 2000, 7121 primary total hip arthroplasties were performed at our institution. We retrospectively reviewed the records in our Total Joint Registry and found that twenty-one patients (twenty-one hips) had sustained an intraoperative acetabular fracture. Nineteen of these patients (nineteen hips) had been followed until revision or for a minimum of two years (mean duration of follow-up, forty-four months). We evaluated the anatomic location, cause, treatment, and outcome of the fractures. Acetabular component designs were categorized as modular, nonmodular (monoblock), true hemispherical, or elliptical, and then each design was analyzed for fracture risk.

Results: No fractures occurred in association with cemented acetabular components. The fracture rate associated with uncemented components was 0.4%. In seventeen hips, the acetabular component was judged to be stable despite the detection of a fracture and the cup was retained. In four hips, the original cup was not stable and therefore was replaced with a design that allowed for supplemental screw fixation. All fractures united, and all cups demonstrated osseous ingrowth at the time of the most recent follow-up. Elliptical monoblock cups were associated with a significantly higher fracture rate than were elliptical modular cups (p < 0.0001) and hemispherical modular cups (p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference between elliptical modular and hemispherical modular components with regard to the fracture rate.

Conclusions: Acetabular fracture during primary total hip arthroplasty is a rare complication of acetabular fixation without cement. In the present series, retention of a stable cup was associated with uneventful osseous ingrowth and excellent early-term outcomes. We found a high rate of fracture in association with the use of monoblock elliptical components.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
D. Davidson, J. Pike, D. Garbuz, C. P. Duncan, and B. A. Masri
Intraoperative Periprosthetic Fractures During Total Hip Arthroplasty. Evaluation and Management
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2008; 90(9): 2000 - 2012.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. H. Huo, N. F. Gilbert, and J. Parvizi
What's New in Total Hip Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2007; 89(8): 1874 - 1885.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Letters to the Editor:

Read all Letters to the Editor

Assessing True Acetabular Size in THA
Louis M. Kwong, M.D., F.A.C.S.
JBJS Online, 25 Oct 2006 [Full text]
Dr. Haidukewych and Colleagues Respond to Dr. Kwong
George J. Haidukewych, M.D., et al.
JBJS Online, 6 Nov 2006 [Full text]