The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2006;88:1795-1801.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00944
© 2006 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Two and Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography for the Classification and Management of Distal Humeral Fractures
Evaluation of Reliability and Diagnostic Accuracy
Job Doornberg, MS1,
Anneluuk Lindenhovius, MS1,
Peter Kloen, MD, PhD2,
C. Niek van Dijk, MD, PhD2,
David Zurakowski, PhD, MPH3 and
David Ring, MD1
1 Massachusetts General Hospital, Yawkey Center, Suite 2100, 55 Fruit Street,
Boston, MA 02116. E-mail address for D. Ring:
dring{at}partners.org
2 Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
E-mail address for P. Kloen:
p.kloen{at}amc.uva.nl
3 Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biostatistics, Children's Hospital,
Boston, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115
Investigation performed at Massachusetts General Hospital and the
Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biostatistics, Children's Hospital,
Boston, Massachusetts, and the Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The
Netherlands
NOTE: The authors acknowledge the substantial contributions of
Drs. Chris Forthman, Chaitanya Mudgal, and Jesse B. Jupiter to this study.
In support of their research for or preparation of this manuscript, one or
more of the authors received grants or outside funding from the AO Foundation.
None of the authors received payments or other benefits or a commitment or
agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial
entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any
research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or
nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or
associated.
Background: Complex fractures of the distal part of the humerus can
be difficult to characterize on plain radiographs and two-dimensional computed
tomography scans. We tested the hypothesis that three-dimensional
reconstructions of computed tomography scans improve the reliability and
accuracy of fracture characterization, classification, and treatment
decisions.
Methods: Five independent observers evaluated thirty consecutive
intra-articular fractures of the distal part of the humerus for the presence
of five fracture characteristics: a fracture line in the coronal plane;
articular comminution; metaphyseal comminution; the presence of separate,
entirely articular fragments; and impaction of the articular surface.
Fractures were also classified according to the AO/ASIF Comprehensive
Classification of Fractures and the classification system of Mehne and Matta.
Two rounds of evaluation were performed and then compared. Initially, a
combination of plain radiographs and two-dimensional computed tomography scans
(2D) were evaluated, and then, two weeks later, a combination of radiographs,
two-dimensional computed tomography scans, and three-dimensional
reconstructions of computed tomography scans (3D) were assessed.
Results: Three-dimensional computed tomography improved both the
intraobserver and the interobserver reliability of the AO classification
system and the Mehne and Matta classification system. Three-dimensional
computed tomography reconstructions also improved the intraobserver agreement
for all fracture characteristics, from moderate (average kappa
[ 2D] = 0.554) to substantial agreement ( 3D
= 0.793). The addition of three-dimensional images had limited influence on
the interobserver reliability and diagnostic characteristics (sensitivity,
specificity, and accuracy) for the recognition of specific fracture
characteristics. Three-dimensional computed tomography images improved
intraobserver agreement ( 2D = 0.62 compared with
3D = 0.75) but not interobserver agreement
( 2D = 0.24 compared with 3D = 0.28) for
treatment decisions.
Conclusions: Three-dimensional reconstructions improve the
reliability, but not the accuracy, of fracture classification and
characterization. The influence of three-dimensional computed tomography was
much more notable for intraobserver comparisons than for interobserver
comparisons, suggesting that different observers see different things in the
scansmost likely a reflection of the training, knowledge, and
experience of the observer with regard to these relatively uncommon and
complex injuries.
Clinical Relevance: In our opinion, three-dimensional computed
tomography is helpful for preoperative planning of the operative treatment of
fractures of the distal part of the humerus.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. G. Guitton, J. N. Doornberg, E. L.F.B. Raaymakers, D. Ring, and P. Kloen
Fractures of the Capitellum and Trochlea
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
February 1, 2009;
91(2):
390 - 397.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. E. Ruchelsman, N. C. Tejwani, Y. W. Kwon, and K. A. Egol
Coronal Plane Partial Articular Fractures of the Distal Humerus: Current Concepts in Management
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg.,
December 1, 2008;
16(12):
716 - 728.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. Scalise, M. J. Codsi, J. Bryan, J. J. Brems, and J. P. Iannotti
The Influence of Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Images of the Shoulder in Preoperative Planning for Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
November 1, 2008;
90(11):
2438 - 2445.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. L. Ramsey, C. L. Getz, and B. O. Parsons
What's New in Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
March 1, 2008;
90(3):
677 - 687.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. A. Cole, T. Miclau III, and M. Bhandari
What's New in Orthopaedic Trauma
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
November 1, 2007;
89(11):
2560 - 2577.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|