The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2006;88:1782-1787.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.00406
© 2006 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Reliability of a Visual Analog Version of the QuickDASH
Leonard N. Matheson, PhD1,
J. Mark Melhorn, MD2,
Tom G. Mayer, MD3,
Brian R. Theodore, PhD Candidate4 and
Robert J. Gatchel, PhD, ABPP5
1 Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine,
4444 Forest Park, St. Louis, MO 63108
2 The Hand Center, 625 North Carriage Parkway, Suite 125, Wichita, KS
67208-4510
3 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical
Center at Dallas, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390
4 PRIDE Research Foundation, 5701 Maple Avenue, Suite 100, Dallas, TX
75235
5 Department of Psychology, College of Science, The University of Texas at
Arlington, 313 Life Science Building, 501 South Nedderman Drive, Arlington, TX
76019-0528. E-mail address:
gatchel{at}uta.edu
Investigation performed at PRIDE Research Foundation, Dallas,
Texas
The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their
research for or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments
or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a
commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or
direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational
institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the
authors are affiliated or associated.
Background: The QuickDASH, an abbreviated form of the Disabilities
of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire, uses a graded-adjectives ordinal
measurement response scale. In order to improve the sensitivity of the measure
and to make it compatible with widely used measures of pain and disability, a
visual analog scale version was developed. The present study investigated the
reliability of the new version over time when used for the evaluation of
patients undergoing treatment.
Methods: A test-retest model with a two-day interval was used to
evaluate a sample of thirty-eight consecutive patients in an interdisciplinary
tertiary rehabilitation setting who were identified as having an upper
extremity disorder.
Results: The intraclass correlation coefficient indicating
test-retest reliability was 0.90 for the eleven-item QuickDASH visual analog
scale questionnaire (without the work component) and 0.94 for the fifteen-item
questionnaire (with the work component), neither of which was significantly
different from the results reported for the original questionnaire.
Conclusions: The QuickDASH visual analog scale questionnaire has
acceptable reliability over time, and it can be used as an alternative to the
original QuickDASH.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. C. Chen and J. B. Jupiter
Management of Distal Radial Fractures
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
September 1, 2007;
89(9):
2051 - 2062.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|