This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) CME: Take the activity for this article: Shoulder/Elbow Test 16: Fall 2006 (publication date November 15, 2006; expi... Letters to the Editor: Submit a response Letters to the Editor: View responses Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My File Cabinet Download to citation manager Rights and Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Guery, J. Articles by Walch, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Guery, J. Articles by Walch, G. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Survivorship Analysis of Eighty Replacements Followed for Five to Ten Years

¹ Service d'Orthopédie et Traumatologie 1, CHU Trousseau, 37044 Tours CEDEX, France. E-mail address for L. Favard: favard{at}med.univ-tours.fr
² Clinique de Traumatologie et d'Orthopédie, 49 Rue Hermite, 54000 Nancy, France
³ Clinique Saint Grégoire, 18 Rue Groison, 37100 Tours, France
⁴ Clinique Sainte Anne Lumière, 85 cours Albert Thomas, 69003 Lyon, France

Investigation performed at Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours-Université François Rabelais, Tours, France

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research for or preparation of this manuscript. One or more of the authors received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity (royalties from Tornier Company). No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

Methods: We carried out a multicenter study with a minimum follow-up of five years and determined the survival rate of the prosthesis according to the initial etiology of the shoulder arthropathy. Eighty prostheses were implanted in seventy-seven patients between 1992 and 1998. Sixty-six shoulders had an arthropathy with a massive rotator cuff tear, and fourteen shoulders had a disorder with another etiology (rheumatoid arthritis, trauma, or revision arthropathy). At the time of review, eighteen patients had died and two were lost to follow-up. The remaining fifty-seven patients (sixty shoulders) were examined or interviewed by telephone at a mean follow-up of 69.6 months. Cumulative survival curves were generated with replacement of the prosthesis, glenoid loosening, and a functional Constant score of <30 as the end points.

Results: The survival rate with replacement of the prosthesis and glenoid loosening as the end points were 91% and 84%, respectively, at 120 months, with shoulders that had arthropathy with a massive rotator cuff tear demonstrating a significantly better result than those that had a disorder with another etiology (p < 0.05). On the other hand, the survival rate with an absolute Constant score of <30 as an end point was 58% at 120 months, with no significant difference with respect to etiology. Two breaks were observed in the survival curves. The first concerned survival until replacement of the prosthesis and occurred at around three years, reflecting early loosening of the prosthesis. The curve then became stable. A second break started at around six years and reflected progressive deterioration of the functional result.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the reverse total prosthesis should be reserved for the treatment of very disabling shoulder arthropathy with a massive rotator cuff rupture, and it should be used exclusively in patients over seventy years old with low functional demands.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Facebook    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Gerber, S. D. Pennington, and R. W. Nyffeler Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., May 1, 2009; 17(5): 284 - 295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Gutierrez, C. A. Comiskey IV, Z.-P. Luo, D. R. Pupello, and M. A. Frankle Range of Impingement-Free Abduction and Adduction Deficit After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty. Hierarchy of Surgical and Implant-Design-Related Factors J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2008; 90(12): 2606 - 2615. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. S. Goldberg, J.-E. Bell, H. J. Kim, S. F. Bak, W. N. Levine, and L. U. Bigliani Hemiarthroplasty for the Rotator Cuff-Deficient Shoulder J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2008; 90(3): 554 - 559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. Ramsey, C. L. Getz, and B. O. Parsons What's New in Shoulder and Elbow Surgery J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2008; 90(3): 677 - 687. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Wall, L. Nove-Josserand, D. P. O'Connor, T. B. Edwards, and G. Walch Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Review of Results According to Etiology J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2007; 89(7): 1476 - 1485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. A. Matsen III, P. Boileau, G. Walch, C. Gerber, and R. T. Bicknell The Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2007; 89(3): 660 - 667. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Rockwood Jr. The Reverse Total Shoulder Prosthesis. The New Kid on the Block J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2007; 89(2): 233 - 235. [Full Text] [PDF]

Letters to the Editor:

Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press (TM) assists in the publication of JBJS Online.
Copyright © 2006 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. Online ISSN: 1535-1386.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery®, JBJS®, JB&JS®, and eJBJS® are registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.