The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2006;88:1458-1466.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00689
© 2006 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Lateral Acetabular Growth Stimulation Following a Labral Support Procedure in Legg-Calvé-Perthes Disease
Marcin E. Domzalski, MD1,
Joe Glutting, PhD2,
J. Richard Bowen, MD2 and
Aaron G. Littleton, BS2
1 Department of Orthopaedics, Medical University of Lodz, St. Drewnowska 75,
91-002 Lodz, Poland
2 Department of Orthopaedics, Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, 1600
Rockland Road, P.O. Box 269, Wilmington, DE 19899. E-mail address for J.R.
Bowen:
jrbowen{at}nemours.org
Investigation performed at the Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children,
Wilmington, Delaware
The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their
research for or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments
or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a
commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or
direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational
institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the
authors are affiliated or associated.
Background: The main goal of containment treatment in cases of
Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease is to prevent hip deformity, which leads to
arthritis in adulthood. Recently, the shelf arthroplasty (the labral support
procedure) has been proposed as a method of containment. The purpose of the
present study was to evaluate growth stimulation of the acetabulum in patients
with unilateral Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease by measuring acetabular
depth and height following treatment with the labral support procedure.
Uninvolved, contralateral hips and hips that were treated with proximal
femoral varus osteotomy were used to compare growth.
Methods: Sixty-five consecutive patients with unilateral
Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease that had been treated with the labral
support procedure (forty-nine) or a proximal femoral varus osteotomy (sixteen)
were evaluated on the basis of radiographic and clinical data that had been
obtained at the time of surgery as well as at one, three, and five years after
surgery. Acetabular dimensions (depth, height, and total depth with shelf)
were measured and, to eliminate radiographic magnification error, the data
were expressed in ratios between the involved and uninvolved sides.
Results: Preoperatively, both surgical groups were comparable.
Acetabular depth indexes at the time of surgery were not different between the
groups (p = 0.46). At one, three, and five years postoperatively, the mean
depth indexes in the labral support group were significantly higher than those
in the proximal femoral varus osteotomy group (F = 5.417, p = 0.001), and
trend analysis showed a significant quadratic effect over time in the labral
support procedure group (F = 13.132, p = 0.001). The acetabular height indexes
at the time of surgery were not different between groups and showed 11% to 13%
acetabular overgrowth. The acetabular height indexes in both groups remained
unchanged at the time of follow-up (F = 2.82, p = 0.1). The total depth index
showed decreasing linear trend values over the period studied (F = 35.115, p =
0.001).
Conclusions: Overgrowth of the acetabulum occurs naturally and early
in the course of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease and is more pronounced in
terms of height. The labral support procedure induces additional lateral
growth of the true acetabulum (excluding the shelf) for three years following
surgery, whereas a proximal femoral varus osteotomy does not. Thus, beneficial
effects of the labral support procedure are lateral acetabular growth
stimulation, prevention of subluxation, and shelf resolution after femoral
epiphyseal reossification.
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See
Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Facebook Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. Sucato and Y.-J. Kim
What's New in Pediatric Orthopaedics
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
May 1, 2007;
89(5):
1141 - 1150.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|