The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2006;88:1215-1222.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00457
© 2006 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Three Hundred and Twenty-one Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures
Hans Lindahl, MD1,
Göran Garellick, MD, PhD1,
Hans Regnér, MD1,
Peter Herberts, MD, PhD1 and
Henrik Malchau, MD, PhD2
1 Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Surgical Sciences (H.L., G.G., and
P.H.), and Department of Radiology (H.R.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital,
Göteborg University, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden. E-mail address for
H. Lindahl:
hans.lindahl{at}vgregion.se
2 Department of Orthopaedics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical
School, 55 Fruit Street, GRJ 1126, Boston, MA 02114
Investigation performed at Sahlgrenska University Hospital,
Göteborg University, Göteborg, and the Department of Orthopaedics,
NU-sjukvården, Uddevalla, Sweden
In support of their research for or preparation of this manuscript, one or
more of the authors received grants or outside funding from Göteborgs
Läkaresällskap, Felix Neuberghs stiftelse. None of the authors
received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide
such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed,
or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation,
educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with
which the authors are affiliated or associated.
Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the
demographics, incidence, and results of treatment of periprosthetic fractures
in a nationwide observational study.
Methods: In the years 1999 and 2000, 321 periprosthetic fractures
were reported to the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register. All of the
associated hospital records were collected. At the time of follow-up, the
Harris hip score, a health-related quality-of-life measure (the EuroQol-5D
[EQ-5D] index), and patient satisfaction were used as outcome measurements. A
radiologist performed the radiographic evaluation.
Results: Ninety-one patients, with a mean age of 73.8 years,
sustained a fracture after one or several revision procedures, and 230
patients, with a mean age of 77.9 years, sustained a fracture after a primary
total hip replacement. Minor trauma, including a fall to the floor, and a
spontaneous fracture were the main etiologies for the injuries. A high number
of patients had a loose stem at the time of the fracture (66% in the primary
replacement group and 51% in the revision group). Eighty-eight percent of the
fractures were classified as Vancouver type B; however, there was difficulty
with preoperative categorization of the fractures radiographically. There was
a high failure rate resulting in a low short to mid-term prosthetic survival
rate. The sixty-six-month survival rate for the entire fracture group, with
reoperation as the end point, was 74.8% ± 5.0%. One factor associated
with fracture risk was implant design.
Conclusions: On the basis of these findings, we believe that
high-risk patients should have routine radiographic follow-up. Such a routine
could identify a loose implant and make intervention possible before a
fracture occurred. Furthermore, we recommend an exploration of the joint to
test the stability of the implant in patients with a Vancouver type-B fracture
in which the stability of the stem is uncertain.
Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions
to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Facebook Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Pike, D. Davidson, D. Garbuz, C. P. Duncan, P. J. O'Brien, and B. A. Masri
Principles of Treatment for Periprosthetic Femoral Shaft Fractures Around Well-fixed Total Hip Arthroplasty
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg.,
November 1, 2009;
17(11):
677 - 688.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Davidson, J. Pike, D. Garbuz, C. P. Duncan, and B. A. Masri
Intraoperative Periprosthetic Fractures During Total Hip Arthroplasty. Evaluation and Management
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
September 1, 2008;
90(9):
2000 - 2012.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Morshed and M. Bhandari
Clinical Trial Design in Fracture-Healing Research: Meeting the Challenge
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
February 1, 2008;
90(Supplement_1):
55 - 61.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Bhattacharyya, D. Chang, J. B. Meigs, D. M. Estok II, and H. Malchau
Mortality After Periprosthetic Fracture of the Femur
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
December 1, 2007;
89(12):
2658 - 2662.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. A. Cole, T. Miclau III, and M. Bhandari
What's New in Orthopaedic Trauma
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
November 1, 2007;
89(11):
2560 - 2577.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|