The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2006;88:1201-1207.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00147
© 2006 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Patient Expectations Regarding Total Knee Arthroplasty: Differences Among the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia
Elizabeth A. Lingard, BPhty, MPhil, MPH1,
Clement B. Sledge, MD2,
Ian D. Learmonth, FRCS3 THE KINEMAX OUTCOMES GROUP*
1 School of Surgical and Reproductive Sciences (Trauma and Orthopaedics), The
Medical School, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, United Kingdom.
E-mail address for E.A. Lingard:
Liz.Lingard{at}nuth.northy.nhs.uk
2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis
Street, Boston, MA 02115
3 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Bristol, Winford Unit, Avon
Orthopaedic Centre, Bristol BS10 5NB, United Kingdom
Investigation performed at Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston,
Massachusetts, and the School of Surgical and Reproductive Sciences (Trauma
and Orthopaedics), University of Newcastle upon Tyne, England
In support of their research for or preparation of this manuscript, one or
more of the authors received grants or outside funding from Stryker Howmedica,
Mahwah, NJ, and Limerick, Ireland. In addition, one or more of the authors
received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide
such benefits from a commercial entity (Stryker Howmedica, Mahwah, NJ, and
Limerick, Ireland). Also, a commercial entity (Stryker Howmedica, Mahwah, NJ,
and Limerick, Ireland) paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, benefits
to a research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable
or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or
associated.
* Kinemax Outcomes Group includes: William Gillespie, Colin Howie, Ian Annan,
Alastair Gibson, and Judith Lane (Princess Margaret Rose Hospital, Edinburgh,
Scotland); Ian Pinder, David Weir, Nigel Brewster, Karen Bettinson, and Sheryl
Mitchell (Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, England); Maurice Needhoff
and Roz Jackson (King's Mill Centre, Mansfield, England); Tim Wilton and Peter
Howard (Derbyshire Royal Infirmary, Derby, England); Ian Forster, Paul Szyprt,
Chris Moran, David Whitaker, Mike Bullock, and Zena Hinchcliffe (Queen's
Medical Centre, Nottingham, England); Ian Learmonth, John Newman, Chris
Ackroyd, George Langkamer, Robert Spencer, Mark Shannon, Evert Smith, John
Dixon, and Sarah Whitehouse (Avon Orthopedic Centre, Bristol, England);
Clement Sledge, Frederick Ewald, Robert Poss, John Wright, Scott Martin, John
Kwon, and Yvette Valderamma (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA); Steven
Harwin and Michael Lichardi (Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, NY); Mark
Mehlhoff, Linda Weiler, and Tom Cahalan (Iowa Medical Clinic, Cedar Rapids,
IA); Richard Cronk and Allyson Sandago (Neuromuscular and Joint Center,
Corvallis, OR); Stephen Rackemann and Emma McLaughlin (The Knee Centre, Gold
Coast, QLD, Australia); and Peter Lewis, Robert Bauze, Gordon Morrison, Tom
Stevenson, and Jane Stirling (Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, SA,
Australia).
Background: Total knee arthroplasty is an effective treatment for
severe osteoarthritis of the knee. Our aim was to determine whether patients
from the United Kingdom, United States, and Australia have different
preoperative expectations regarding total knee arthroplasty and whether these
expectations have an impact on outcomes and patient satisfaction.
Methods: Patients from the United Kingdom, the United States, and
Australia were recruited into a prospective observational study of primary
total knee arthroplasty for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Preoperative
expectations, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index
(WOMAC) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores, and demographic, socioeconomic, and
follow-up data, including satisfaction with outcome, were obtained from
self-administered patient questionnaires.
Results: A total of 598 patients with a mean age of sixty-nine years
at the time of the index arthroplasty were recruited; 58% were women. The
majority of patients expected to have no pain at twelve months after the
surgery, and with the numbers available there was no significant difference
among the countries with regard to pain expectations. Australian patients were
more likely than patients in the United Kingdom or the United States to expect
better function at twelve months after the surgery. With the numbers
available, satisfaction scores at twelve months did not differ significantly
among the countries and were not influenced by preoperative expectations.
Australian patients were more likely than patients in the United Kingdom or
the United States to be unwilling to undergo total knee arthroplasty again at
twelve months under similar circumstances.
Conclusions: Patients from different countries have different
expectations regarding total knee arthroplasty, which are not fully explained
by differences in sociodemographic factors, clinical characteristics, and pain
and functional status. Australian patients had the highest expectations but,
despite reporting similar outcomes and satisfaction following total knee
arthroplasty, they were more likely not to want to have the surgery again
under similar circumstances.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. A. Lingard and D. L. Riddle
Impact of Psychological Distress on Pain and Function Following Knee Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
June 1, 2007;
89(6):
1161 - 1169.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|