This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) CME: Take the exams for this article: CME 2: April, May, June 2006 (publication date July 5, 2006; expiration dat... Foot/Ankle Test 8: Summer 2006 (publication date August 15, 2006; expiratio... Trauma Test 12: Summer 2006 (publication date August 15, 2006; expiration d... Letters to the Editor: Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My File Cabinet Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Egol, K. A. Articles by Koval, K. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Egol, K. A. Articles by Koval, K. J. Related Collections Foot/Ankle Social Bookmarking             What's this?

Predictors of Short-Term Functional Outcome Following Ankle Fracture Surgery

¹ Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases, 301 East 17th Street, Suite 1402, New York, NY 10003. E-mail address for K.A. Egol: egolk01{at}nyumc.org
² Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03756

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research for or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

Methods: Over three years, 232 patients who sustained a fracture of the ankle and were treated surgically were followed prospectively, for a minimum of one year. Trained interviewers recorded baseline characteristics, including patient demographics, medical comorbidities, and functional status according to the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA). Laboratory findings, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, and operative findings were recorded from the chart during hospitalization. Follow-up information included the occurrence of complications or additional surgery, weight-bearing status, functional status according to the SMFA, and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score. The data were analyzed to determine predictors of functional recovery at three months, six months, and one year postoperatively.

Results: Complete follow-up data were available for 198 patients (85%). At one year, 174 (88%) of the patients had either no or mild ankle pain and 178 (90%) had either no limitations or limitations only in recreational activities. According to the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score, 178 (90%) of the patients had 90% functional recovery. A patient age of less than forty years was a predictor of recovery, as measured with the SMFA subscores, at six months after the ankle fracture. At one year, however, age was no longer a predictor of recovery. Patients who were younger than forty were more likely to recover 90% of function (p = 0.004), and men were more likely than women to recover function (p = 0.02). ASA Class 1 or 2 (p = 0.03) and an absence of diabetes (p = 0.02) were also predictors of better functional recovery at one year. SMFA subscores were below average at baseline, indicating a healthy population. At three and six months postoperatively, all SMFA subscores were significantly higher than the baseline subscores (p < 0.001); however, at one year, the SMFA subscores were almost back to the baseline, normal level.

Conclusions: One year after ankle fracture surgery, patients are generally doing well, with most experiencing little or mild pain and few restrictions in functional activities. They have a significant improvement in function compared with six months after the surgery. Younger age, male sex, absence of diabetes, and a lower ASA class are predictive of functional recovery at one year following ankle fracture surgery. It is important to counsel patients and their families regarding the expected functional recovery after an ankle injury.

Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level I. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. K. Wukich and A. J. Kline The Management of Ankle Fractures in Patients with Diabetes J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2008; 90(7): 1570 - 1578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. A. Alade and M. S. Mizel What's New in Foot and Ankle Surgery J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2007; 89(4): 914 - 921. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. A. Cole and M. Bhandari What's New in Orthopaedic Trauma J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 2006; 88(11): 2545 - 2561. [Full Text] [PDF]

Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press (TM) assists in the publication of JBJS Online.
Copyright © 2006 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. Online ISSN: 1535-1386.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery®, JBJS®, JB&JS®, and eJBJS® are registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.