The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2006;88:715-720.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00107
© 2006 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Comparison of the Vastus-Splitting and Median Parapatellar Approaches for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized Study
Matthew J. Kelly, MD1,
Mustasim N. Rumi, MD2,
Milind Kothari, DO3,
Michael A. Parentis, MD4,
Katrina J. Bailey, PT3,
William M. Parrish, MD3 and
Vincent D. Pellegrini, Jr., MD5
1 20415 Stable Lane, Waynesville, MO 65583
2 Orthopaedic Associates of Central Texas, 16020 Park Valley Drive, Round Rock,
TX 78746
3 Departments of Neurology (M.K.), Physical Therapy (K.J.B.), and Orthopaedics
and Rehabilitation (W.M.P.), The Pennsylvania State University College of
Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033
4 The Knee Center of Western New York 100 Corporate Way, Suite 12, Amherst NY
14226
5 Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22
South Greene Street, Suite S 11 B, Baltimore, MD 21201. E-mail address:
vpellegrini{at}umoa.umm.edu
Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics and
Rehabilitation, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine,
Hershey, Pennsylvania
A video supplement to this article is being developed by the American
Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and JBJS and will be available at the JBJS web
site,
www.jbjs.org.
To obtain a copy of the video, contact the AAOS at 800-626-6726 or go to their
web site,
www.aaos.org,
and click on Educational Resources Catalog.
The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their
research for or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments
or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a
commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or
direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational
institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the
authors are affiliated or associated.
Background: A vastus-splitting approach for total knee arthroplasty
has been advocated to preserve function of the extensor mechanism and to
decrease the prevalence of lateral release. Critics have claimed that there is
greater blood loss and compromised exposure in large patients who are managed
with this approach. The purpose of the present study was to compare
vastus-splitting and median parapatellar approaches for primary total knee
arthroplasty.
Methods: Forty-two consecutive patients (fifty-one knees) undergoing
primary total knee arthroplasty were randomized to treatment with a median
parapatellar or vastus-splitting approach. The interval of the vastus muscle
split was marked with radiopaque vascular clips. Surgical data, functional
parameters, and preoperative and postoperative electromyograms were
assessed.
Results: Early (six-month) and intermediate-term (five-year)
follow-up showed no differences in functional parameters, tourniquet time, or
the frequency of patellar resurfacing. Significantly more lateral releases (p
< 0.01) and greater blood loss (p = 0.03) occurred in the median
parapatellar group. Nine (43%) of twenty-one knees in the vastus-splitting
group had abnormal electromyographic findings at six months postoperatively,
whereas all patients in the median parapatellar group had normal findings.
Seven knees with abnormal electromyographic findings at six months had normal
findings when restudied at five years; in each of these knees, the vastus
split had been developed bluntly. The other two knees with abnormal findings
at six months had had sharp dissection for the muscle split. Both of these
knees had chronic changes, one with changes indicative of reinnervation and
the other with ongoing denervation, but neither demonstrated functional
compromise.
Conclusions: The vastus-splitting approach offers a viable
alternative to the median parapatellar approach for primary total knee
arthroplasty that reduces the need for lateral retinacular release without
impairment of quadriceps function. Electromyographic abnormalities in the
quadriceps muscle have no functional consequence and most likely represent
reversible neurapraxic injury that may be avoided by blunt dissection in the
vastus medialis muscle.
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions
to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Facebook Technorati Twitter What's this?
Related articles in JBJS:
- Comparison of the Vastus-Splitting and Median Parapatellar Approaches for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized Study. Surgical Technique
- Matthew J. Kelly, Mustasim N. Rumi, Milind Kothari, Michael A. Parentis, Katrina J. Bailey, William M. Parrish, and Vincent D. Pellegrini, Jr.
JBJS 2007 89: 80-92.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Kelly, M. N. Rumi, M. Kothari, M. A. Parentis, K. J. Bailey, W. M. Parrish, and V. D. Pellegrini Jr.
Comparison of the Vastus-Splitting and Median Parapatellar Approaches for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized Study. Surgical Technique
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
March 1, 2007;
89(2_suppl_1):
80 - 92.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|