The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2006;88:692-697.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00232
© 2006 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the exams for this article:
 CME 2: April, May, June 2006 (publication date July 5, 2006; expiration dat...
Trauma Test 12: Summer 2006 (publication date August 15, 2006; expiration d...
Right arrow [Supplementary Material]
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhattacharyya, T.
Right arrow Articles by Salamipour, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bhattacharyya, T.
Right arrow Articles by Salamipour, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Adult Trauma
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Accuracy of Computed Tomography for the Diagnosis of Tibial Nonunion

Timothy Bhattacharyya, MD1, Kimberly A. Bouchard, BA1, Anurada Phadke, BA1, James B. Meigs, MD2, Ara Kassarjian, MD3 and Hamid Salamipour, MD3

1 Partners Orthopaedic Trauma Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey 3600, Boston, MA 02118.
2 General Medicine Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Staniford Street, 9th Floor, Boston, MA 02114
3 Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey 6th Floor, Room 6040, Boston, MA 02114

Investigation performed at Partners Orthopaedic Trauma Service, Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

A commentary is available with the electronic versions of this article, on our web site (www.jbjs.org) and on our quarterly CD-ROM (call our subscription department, at 781-449-9780, to order the CD-ROM).

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research for or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

Background: When a patient is seen with a possible tibial nonunion and equivocal findings on plain radiographs, the surgeon may choose to obtain a computed tomography scan to better delineate the bone anatomy. However, the sensitivity and specificity of computed tomography in this setting is not known. We investigated the accuracy of computed tomography for detecting nonunion in this clinical situation.

Methods: Thirty-five patients with equivocal findings on plain radiographs underwent computed tomography scanning. The patients were first seen at an average of 9.7 months after the injury and had undergone a mean of 2.6 prior operations. A so-called gold standard of union or nonunion was determined by either surgical findings (for twenty-five patients who were operatively treated) or six months of clinical observation (for ten patients who had nonoperative treatment). Computed tomography scans were assessed by two radiologists and one orthopaedic surgeon who were blinded to the clinical outcome.

Results: Computed tomography scans displayed very good diagnostic accuracy. Intraobserver agreement was high (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.89), the sensitivity for detecting nonunion was 100%, and the overall accuracy was 89.9%. Computed tomography was limited by a low specificity of 62%, as three patients who were diagnosed as having tibial nonunion with computed tomography underwent surgery and were found to have a healed fracture.

Conclusions: Computed tomography displays very good accuracy in the evaluation of tibial fracture-healing. However, it is limited by low specificity and may sometimes misrepresent a healed fracture as a nonunion. Surgeons must be aware of this pitfall in order to accurately determine which patients need surgical intervention.

Level of Evidence: Diagnostic Level I. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
J. R. Lynch, L. A. Taitsman, D. P. Barei, and S. E. Nork
Femoral Nonunion: Risk Factors and Treatment Options
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., February 1, 2008; 16(2): 88 - 97.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
S. Morshed, L. Corrales, H. Genant, and T. Miclau III
Outcome Assessment in Clinical Trials of Fracture-Healing
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2008; 90(Supplement_1): 62 - 67.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]