The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2006;88:575-582.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.02488
© 2006 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Functional Results and Quality of Life After Treatment of Pelvic Sarcomas Involving the Acetabulum
C. Hoffmann, MD1,
G. Gosheger, MD1,
C. Gebert, MD1,
H. Jürgens, MD1 and
W. Winkelmann, MD1
1 Departments of Orthopedics (C.H., G.G., C.G., and W.W.) and Pediatric
Hematology and Oncology (H.J.), University of Münster, Albert Schweitzer
Strasse 33, 48129 Münster, Germany. E-mail address for C. Hoffmann:
christiane-hoffmann{at}arcor.de.
E-mail address for G. Gosheger:
goshegg{at}uni-muenster.de.
E-mail address for C. Gebert:
cgebert{at}uni-muenster.de.
E-mail address for H. Jürgens:
jurgh{at}uni-muenster.de.
E-mail address for W. Winkelmann:
fiegehi{at}mednet.uni-muenster.de
Investigation performed at the Departments of Orthopedics and Pediatric
Hematology and Oncology, University of Münster, Münster,
Germany
In support of their research for or preparation of this manuscript, one or
more of the authors received grants or outside funding from Deutsche
Krebshilfe German Cancer Aid. None of the authors received payments or other
benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a
commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or
direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational
institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the
authors are affiliated or associated.
Background: Limb salvage after resection of a pelvic sarcoma that
involves the acetabulum represents a surgical challenge. The ideal method of
reconstruction after acetabular resection remains a subject of controversy,
and the outcome in terms of the impact of therapy is still unknown. The
purpose of this study was to determine the impact of surgery on health-related
quality of life and function after acetabular resection.
Methods: Eighty-one patients with a pelvic sarcoma underwent
acetabular resection at a single institution. Functional evaluation and
quality-of-life examination were performed in forty-five patients, and these
patients comprised the study group. Quality of life was assessed with use of
the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer core
quality-of-life questionnaire. Function was assessed with use of the
Musculoskeletal Tumor Society system.
Results: The median age of the patients was 30.4 years at the time
of the acetabular resection and 35.7 years at the time of follow-up. The
median time interval from the index operation to the latest follow-up was
sixty-nine months. At the latest follow-up evaluation, the mean functional
status score was 14.5 points of a maximum of 30 points. In a comparison of
endoprosthetic replacement and hip transposition following resection,
significantly better functional results (p = 0.017) and a lower number of
complications were found in patients who had a hip transposition.
Quality-of-life assessment results were also better in patients with a hip
transposition, especially in role functioning (p = 0.043).
Conclusions: On the basis of the low complication rate and the good
functional and quality-of-life results, hip transposition after acetabular
resection seems to be the optimal technique for treating patients with a
pelvic sarcoma involving the acetabulum.
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See
Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
|