The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2006;88:366-371.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00123
© 2006 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the activities for this article:
 Adult Knee Reconstruction Test 11: Spring 2006 (publication date May 15, 20...
CME 1: January, February, March 2006
Right arrow [Supplementary Material]
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Springer, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Carrington, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Springer, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Carrington, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Adult Knee
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

McKeever Hemiarthroplasty of the Knee in Patients Less Than Sixty Years Old

Bryan D. Springer, MD1, Richard D. Scott, MD2, Alexander P. Sah, MD1 and Richard Carrington, FRCS(Orth)3

1 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail address for B.D. Springer: bryan.springer{at}orthocarolina.com
2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, 125 Parker Hill Avenue, Boston, MA 02120
3 The Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, Stanmore HA7 4LP, United Kingdom

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research for or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

Background: Knee arthritis in the young patient is a challenging problem that may necessitate surgical treatment. We continue to perform hemiarthroplasty with a metallic tibial implant in selected young patients who, for various reasons, are not candidates for osteotomy, unicompartmental arthroplasty, or total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of the present study was to determine the minimum twelve-year results of this procedure in young patients.

Methods: The original study group consisted of a consecutive series of twenty-four patients (twenty-six knees) who were managed with McKeever tibial hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee. All patients were younger than sixty years of age at the time of the index procedure (average age, 44.6 years). During the study period, two patients died and one was lost to follow-up, leaving twenty-one patients (twenty-three knees) available for review. All patients were followed clinically for a minimum of twelve years or until revision. Knee Society knee and functional scores and Tegner scores were determined, and seven of the ten implants were evaluated radiographically.

Results: Thirteen knees were revised at an average of eight years after the index procedures. All thirteen knees had an uncomplicated revision to either a unicompartmental arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty. Ten retained implants were available for clinical review after an average duration of follow-up of 16.8 years. The mean Knee Society knee scores, functional scores, and Tegner scores, available for nine of these ten knees, were 80, 97, and 4.2, respectively.

Conclusions: We believe that the McKeever tibial hemiarthroplasty continues to be a reasonable surgical option for patients who are not candidates for osteotomy and are too young or too active for a unicompartmental or total knee arthroplasty.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?