The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2006;88:355-365.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00464
© 2006 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Direct Percutaneous Gene Delivery to Enhance Healing of Segmental Bone Defects
Oliver B. Betz, PhD1,
Volker M. Betz, MD1,
Ara Nazarian, MSc2,
Carmencita G. Pilapil, MS1,
Mark S. Vrahas, MD1,
Mary L. Bouxsein, PhD2,
Louis C. Gerstenfeld, PhD3,
Thomas A. Einhorn, MD3 and
Christopher H. Evans, PhD1
1 Center for Molecular Orthopaedics, 221 Longwood Avenue, BLI-152, Boston, MA
02115. E-mail address for C.H. Evans:
cevans{at}rics.bwh.harvard.edu
2 Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center,
Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215
3 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston University Medical Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, 720 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA 02118
Investigation performed at the Center for Molecular Orthopaedics and
the Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Harvard Medical School, and the
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine,
Boston, Massachusetts
In support of their research for or preparation of this manuscript, one or
more of the authors received grants or outside funding from National
Institutes of Health Grant AR 050243-01, Zimmer, and the Orthopaedic Trauma
Association. None of the authors received payments or other benefits or a
commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No
commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits
to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable
or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or
associated.
Background: Healing of segmental bone defects can be induced
experimentally with genetically modified osteoprogenitor cells, an ex vivo
strategy that requires two operative interventions and substantial cost.
Direct transfer of osteogenic genes offers an alternative, clinically
expeditious, cost-effective approach. We evaluated its potential in a
well-established, critical-size, rat femoral defect model.
Methods: A critical-size defect was created in the right femur of
forty-eight skeletally mature Sprague-Dawley rats. After twenty-four hours,
each defect received a single, intralesional, percutaneous injection of
adenovirus carrying bone morphogenetic protein-2 (Ad.BMP-2) or luciferase cDNA
(Ad.luc) or it remained untreated. Healing was monitored with weekly
radiographs. At eight weeks, the rats were killed and the femora were
evaluated with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, micro-computed tomography,
histological analysis, histomorphometry, and torsional mechanical testing.
Results: Radiographically, 75% of the Ad.BMP-2-treated femora showed
osseous union. Bone mineral content was similar between the Ad.BMP-2-treated
femora (0.045 ± 0.020 g) and the contralateral, intact femora (0.047
± 0.003 g). Histologically, 50% of the Ad.BMP-2-treated defects were
bridged by lamellar, trabecular bone; the other 50% contained islands of
cartilage. The control (Ad.luc-treated) defects were filled with fibrous
tissue. Histomorphometry demonstrated a large difference in osteogenesis
between the Ad.BMP-2 group (mean bone area, 3.25 ± 0.67 mm2)
and the controls (mean bone area, 0.65 ± 0.67 mm2). By eight
weeks, the Ad.BMP-2-treated femora had approximately one-fourth of the
strength (mean, 0.07 ± 0.04 Nm) and stiffness (mean, 0.5 ± 0.4
Nm/rad) of the contralateral femora (0.3 ± 0.08 Nm and 2.0 ± 0.5
Nm/rad, respectively).
Conclusions: A single, percutaneous, intralesional injection of
Ad.BMP-2 induces healing of critical-size femoral bone defects in rats within
eight weeks. At this time, the repair tissue is predominantly trabecular bone,
has normal bone mineral content, and has gained mechanical strength.
Clinical Relevance: Direct administration of adenovirus carrying
BMP-2 could provide a straightforward and cost-effective treatment for large
osseous defects with adequate surrounding soft-tissue support. This local in
vivo genetherapy approach avoids the cost and complexity of ex vivo methods
that require artificial scaffolds and autologous cell culture.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. C. Carofino and J. R. Lieberman
Gene Therapy Applications for Fracture-Healing
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
February 1, 2008;
90(Supplement_1):
99 - 110.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. G. Zalavras, R. E. Marcus, L. S. Levin, and M. J. Patzakis
Management of open fractures and subsequent complications.
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
April 1, 2007;
89(4):
884 - 895.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Letters to the Editor:
Read all Letters to the Editor
- Alternative Method of Gene Delivery
- DHANASEKARAN KOTILINGAM, M.D.
- JBJS Online, 16 Feb 2006
[Full text]
|