The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2006;88:349-354.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00011
© 2006 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the exams for this article:
Hand Test 6: Fall 2006 (publication date November 15, 2006; expiration date...
CME 1: January, February, March 2006
Trauma Test 11: Spring 2006 (publication date May 15, 2006; expiration date...
Right arrow [Supplementary Material]
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Egol, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Koval, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Egol, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Koval, K. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Hand/Wrist
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Treatment of External Fixation Pins About the Wrist: A Prospective, Randomized Trial

Kenneth A. Egol, MD1, Nader Paksima, DO, MPH1, Steven Puopolo, MD1, Jeffrey Klugman, MD1, Rudi Hiebert, MSc1 and Kenneth J. Koval, MD2

1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University—Hospital for Joint Diseases, 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY 10003. E-mail address for K.A. Egol: ljegol{at}att.net
2 Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03756

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University—Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY

A commentary is available with the electronic versions of this article, on our web site (www.jbjs.org) and on our quarterly CD-ROM (call our subscription department, at 781-449-9780, to order the CD-ROM).

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research for or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.


Background: Pin-track infection remains one of the most troublesome complications of external fixation, in some cases compromising otherwise successful fracture treatment.

Methods: One hundred and eighteen patients (120 wrists) who had been managed with the placement of an external fixation device for the treatment of a displaced, unstable, distal radial fracture were randomized into one of three treatment groups: (1) weekly dry dressing changes without pin-site care; (2) daily pin-site care with a solution of one-half normal saline solution and one-half hydrogen peroxide; and (3) treatment with the placement of chlorhexidine-impregnated discs (Biopatch) around the pins, with weekly changes of the discs by the treating surgeon. The patients were followed at weekly intervals until the external fixator was removed. Radiographs were made biweekly. The patients were evaluated with regard to (1) erythema, (2) cellulitis, (3) drainage, (4) clinical or radiographic evidence of pin-loosening, (5) the need for antibiotics, and (6) the need for pin removal before fracture-healing due to infection. Differences in complication rates among the three groups, with adjustment for patient age, gender, and the performance of an associated open procedure, were evaluated.

Results: The average age of the patients was fifty-four years. Forty-seven wrists had an open procedure (either bone-grafting or open reduction and internal fixation) in addition to treatment with the external fixator. The fixators remained in place for an average of 5.9 weeks. Twenty-three patients (19%) had a complication related to the pin track, with twelve of these patients requiring oral antibiotics for the treatment of a pin-track infection. There were no significant differences among the three groups with regard to the prevalence of pin-site complications. The age of the patient was found to be significantly associated with an increased risk of postoperative pin-track complications (p = 0.04).

Conclusions: We found a high rate of local wound complications around external fixation pin sites; however, most complications were minor and could be observed or treated with oral antibiotics. The prevalence of these complications was not decreased in association with the use of hydrogen peroxide wound care or chlorhexidine-impregnated dressings. On the basis of these results, we do not recommend additional wound care beyond the use of dry, sterile dressings for pin-track care after external fixation for the treatment of distal radial fractures.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


Letters to the Editor:

Read all Letters to the Editor

External fixator pin infections - the need for a different approach to studying after-care protocols
Selvadurai Nayagam, BSc, MB ChB, MCh (Orth), FRCS (Orth), et al.
JBJS Online, 10 Apr 2006 [Full text]
Dr. Egol and colleagues respond to Mr. Nayagam
Kenneth A. Egol, M.D., et al.
JBJS Online, 10 Apr 2006 [Full text]