The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2006;88:317-325.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.02968
© 2006 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
High Pain Ratings Predict Treatment Failure in Chronic Occupational Musculoskeletal Disorders
Donald D. McGeary, PhD1,
Tom G. Mayer, MD2 and
Robert J. Gatchel, PhD3
1 PRIDE (Productive Rehabilitation Institute of Dallas for Ergonomics) Research
Foundation, 5701 Maple Avenue, Dallas, TX 75235
2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical
Center at Dallas, 5701 Maple Avenue, Suite 100, Dallas, TX 75235. E-mail
address:
tgmayer{at}pridedallas.com
3 Department of Psychology, College of Science, University of Texas at
Arlington, 501 South Nedderman Drive, #313, Arlington, TX 76019-0528
Investigation performed at the Productive Rehabilitation Institute of
Dallas for Ergonomics (PRIDE), Dallas; the Departments of Orthopedic Surgery
and Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern
Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas; and the Department of Psychology, University
of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas
In support of their research for or preparation of this manuscript, one or
more of the authors received grants or outside funding from the National
Institutes of Health Grants IK05 MH071892, 2R01 MH46452 and 2R01 DE107138.
None of the authors received payments or other benefits or a commitment or
agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial
entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any
research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or
nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or
associated.
Background: Pain intensity is one of the most widely used measures
in the treatment of patients with chronic disabling occupational
musculoskeletal disorders. Few studies have comprehensively investigated the
relationship of pain intensity at the time of rehabilitation to objective
socioeconomic outcomes at one year after treatment. This study evaluated the
ability of pain intensity ratings, measured with a visual analog scale, to
predict rehabilitation outcomes and to identify patients who are "at
risk" for a poor outcome.
Methods: A cohort of 3106 patients with chronic disabling
occupational musculoskeletal disorders in a multidisciplinary occupational
tertiary rehabilitation program was divided into four groups on the basis of
the pain intensity ratings (0 to 3, 4 to 5, 6 to 7, and 8 to 10) before and
after rehabilitation. A structured interview to assess the socioeconomic
outcomes, including work status, health-care utilization, recurrent injury,
and whether there had been resolution of Workers' Compensation or third-party
financial disputes, was conducted one year after rehabilitation.
Results: High pain intensity before rehabilitation was linearly
associated with declining rates of program completion and higher rates of
self-reported depression and disability after rehabilitation. Although higher
pain ratings both before and after rehabilitation were associated linearly
with a declining quality of socioeconomic outcomes, extremely high pain
ratings (8 to 10) after rehabilitation were most predictive of poor outcomes.
At the post-rehabilitation evaluation, patients with extreme pain were far
more likely than those with mild pain to seek surgical treatment (risk ratio =
11.2 [95% confidence interval, 4.3, 29.5]) or to persist in seeking health
care from new providers (risk ratio = 3.3 [95% confidence interval, 2.4,
4.5]). They were less likely to either return to work (risk ratio = 3.9 [95%
confidence interval, 2.6, 6.0]) or to retain work (risk ratio = 4.2 [95%
confidence interval, 2.9, 6.0]). They were also twice as likely to claim a new
injury to the same musculoskeletal site after returning to work and to fail to
settle Workers' Compensation or third-party financial disputes.
Conclusions: High pain ratings before rehabilitation are associated
with higher rehabilitation dropout rates. The patients with chronic disabling
occupational musculoskeletal disorders who reported extreme pain after
completing a full course of extended treatment (13% of 2573) were at risk for
poor outcomes in terms of lost productivity, high utilization of health care,
and cost-shifting of state Workers' Compensation payments to federal
resources.
Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level I. See Instructions
to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Gatchel and T. G. Mayer
Psychological Evaluation of the Spine Patient
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg.,
February 1, 2008;
16(2):
107 - 112.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. D. Wera, R. E. Marcus, A. J. Ghanayem, and H. H. Bohlman
Failure within One Year Following Subtotal Lumbar Discectomy
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
January 1, 2008;
90(1):
10 - 15.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. S. Reuben and A. Buvanendran
Preventing the Development of Chronic Pain After Orthopaedic Surgery with Preventive Multimodal Analgesic Techniques
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
June 1, 2007;
89(6):
1343 - 1358.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. N. Matheson, J. M. Melhorn, T. G. Mayer, B. R. Theodore, and R. J. Gatchel
Reliability of a Visual Analog Version of the QuickDASH
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
August 1, 2006;
88(8):
1782 - 1787.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|