The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2006;88:84-91.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.01024
© 2006 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Surgical Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement: Evaluation of the Effect of the Size of the Resection
Rodrigo M. Mardones, MD1,
Carlos Gonzalez, MS2,
Qingshan Chen, MS2,
Mark Zobitz, MS2,
Kenton R. Kaufman, PhD2 and
Robert T. Trousdale, MD3
1 Departmento de Ortopedia y Traumatología, Pontificia Universidad
Católica de Chile, Lira 41 Oficina 1, 2 Piso, Santiago, Chile. E-mail
address:
drmarpeter{at}entelchile.net
2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Mayo
Clinic, 200 First Street S.W., Rochester, MN 55905.
3 Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Mayo
Clinic, 200 First Street S.W., Rochester, MN 55905. E-mail address for R.T.
Trousdale:
trousdale.robert{at}mayo.edu
Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery and
Orthopedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
The original scientific article in which the surgical technique was
presented was published in JBJS Vol. 87-A, pp.
273-279, February 2005
The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their
research for or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments
or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a
commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or
direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational
institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the
authors are affiliated or associated.
The line drawings in this article are the work of Jennifer Fairman
(jfairman{at}fairmanstudios.com).
BACKGROUND: In patients with symptomatic hip impingement, surgical
resection of the femoral head-neck junction may improve the range of motion
and relieve pain. A risk of this procedure is fracture. We evaluated the
amount of resection of the anterolateral aspect of the femoral head-neck
junction that can be done safely.
METHODS: Cadaveric proximal femoral specimens (fifteen matched
pairs) were divided into three groups: 10%, 30%, or 50% of the diameter of one
femoral neck was removed, and the contralateral femoral neck was left intact
to serve as the control. A compressive load was applied directly to the
femoral head. Peak load, stiffness, and energy to fracture were compared among
the groups.
RESULTS: The energy to fracture differed significantly (p = 0.0015)
among the 10%, 30%, and 50% resection groups. The peak load after the 50%
resection was significantly less (p = 0.0025) than that after the 10% or 30%
resection. With the numbers available, there was no significant difference in
peak load between the 10% and 30% resections.
CONCLUSIONS: Resection of up to 30% of the anterolateral quadrant of
the head-neck junction did not significantly alter the load-bearing capacity
of the proximal part of the femur. However, a 30% resection significantly
decreased the amount of energy required to produce a fracture. Thirty percent
should be considered to be the greatest feasible amount of resection because
of the change in the pattern of the femoral head-neck response to axial loads
that we observed.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
Related articles in JBJS:
- Surgical Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement: Evaluation of the Effect of the Size of the Resection
- Rodrigo M. Mardones, Carlos Gonzalez, Qingshan Chen, Mark Zobitz, Kenton R. Kaufman, and Robert T. Trousdale
JBJS 2005 87: 273-279.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Mont and T. P. Schmalzried
Modern Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing: Important Observations from the First Ten Years
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
August 1, 2008;
90(Supplement_3):
3 - 11.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Jacobs, R. N. Goytia, and T. Bhargava
Hip Resurfacing through an Anterolateral Approach. Surgical Description and Early Review
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
August 1, 2008;
90(Supplement_3):
38 - 44.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. D. Grant, F. H. Fahey, A. B. Packard, R. T. Davis, A. Alavi, and S. T. Treves
Skeletal PET with 18F-Fluoride: Applying New Technology to an Old Tracer
J. Nucl. Med.,
January 1, 2008;
49(1):
68 - 78.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. V. Maheshwari, A. Malik, and L. D. Dorr
Impingement of the Native Hip Joint
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
November 1, 2007;
89(11):
2508 - 2518.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Malik, A. Maheshwari, and L. D. Dorr
Impingement with Total Hip Replacement
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
August 1, 2007;
89(8):
1832 - 1842.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K.-P. Gunther, A. Hartmann, P. Aikele, D. Aust, and J. Ziegler
Large Femoral-Neck Cysts in Association with Femoroacetabular Impingement. A Report of Three Cases
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
April 1, 2007;
89(4):
863 - 870.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Espinosa, M. Leunig, and R. Ganz
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
November 1, 2006;
88(11):
2537 - 2538.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|