The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2006;88:119-134.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00862
© 2006 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JBJS
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paley, D.
Right arrow Articles by Herzenberg, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Paley, D.
Right arrow Articles by Herzenberg, J. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Surgical Techniques
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Treatment of Malunion and Nonunion at the Site of an Ankle Fusion with the Ilizarov Apparatus

Dror Paley, MD2, Bradley M. Lamm, DPM1, Dimitris Katsenis, MD3, Anil Bhave, PT1 and John E. Herzenberg, MD1

1 International Center for Limb Lengthening, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, 2401 West Belvedere Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21215.
2 International Center for Limb Lengthening, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, 2401 West Belvedere Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21215. E-mail address for D. Paley: dpaley{at}lifebridgehealth.org
3 Zografou 21, 21200, Argos, Greece

Investigation performed at the International Center for Limb Lengthening, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland

The original scientific article in which the surgical technique was presented was published in JBJS Vol. 87-A, pp. 302-309, February 2005

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research for or preparation of this manuscript. The authors received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity (Smith and Nephew). A commercial entity (Smith and Nephew) paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, benefits to a research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or non-profit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

The line drawings in this article are the work of Joanne Haderer Müller of Haderer & Müller (biomedart{at}haderermuller.com).

BACKGROUND: Malunion and nonunion of an ankle fusion site are associated with pain, osteomyelitis, limblength discrepancy, and deformity. The Ilizarov reconstruction has been used to treat these challenging problems.

METHODS: We reviewed the results in twenty-one ankles that had undergone a revision of a failed fusion, with simultaneous treatment of coexisting pathologic conditions, with use of the Ilizarov technique. Eight patients had undergone ankle fusion only, eleven had undergone ankle and subtalar fusion, and two had undergone pantalar fusion. Eighteen patients with an average limb-length discrepancy of 4 cm underwent limb lengthening simultaneously with the revision surgery. The average patient age was forty years. Indications for treatment were malunion (eleven patients), aseptic nonunion (eight patients), and infected nonunion (two patients). Clinical, subjective, objective, gait, and radiographic analyses were performed after an average duration of follow-up of 83.4 months.

RESULTS: Solid union was achieved in all ankles. The functional result was excellent for fifteen patients, good for three, fair for two, and poor for one. The bone result was excellent for ten ankles, good for nine, fair for one, and poor for one. All eighteen patients who underwent gait analysis had a heel-to-toe progression gait, and twelve achieved normal walking velocity with their shoes on. A plantigrade foot was achieved in each case, and only two patients had >5° of residual deformity. During the Ilizarov treatment, forty-one minor complications (treated conservatively) and twenty major complications (treated surgically) occurred. After removal of the circular frame, seven other complications, which required four additional operations, occurred.

CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a failed ankle fusion, infection, limb-length discrepancy, and foot deformity can be addressed simultaneously with use of the Ilizarov apparatus to achieve a solid union and a plantigrade foot, usually with a clinically satisfactory result.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related articles in JBJS:

Treatment of Malunion and Nonunion at the Site of an Ankle Fusion with the Ilizarov Apparatus
Dimitris Katsenis, Anil Bhave, Dror Paley, and John E. Herzenberg
JBJS 2005 87: 302-309. [Abstract] [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JBJSHome page
M. E. Easley, H. E. Montijo, J. B. Wilson, R. D. Fitch, and J. A. Nunley II
Revision Tibiotalar Arthrodesis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2008; 90(6): 1212 - 1223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]