The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2006;88:11-23.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00841
© 2006 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JBJS
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ikeda, M.
Right arrow Articles by Oka, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ikeda, M.
Right arrow Articles by Oka, Y.
Related Collections
Right arrow Surgical Techniques
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Comminuted Fractures of the Radial Head: Comparison of Resection and Internal Fixation

Masayoshi Ikeda, MD, PhD2, Kazuhiro Sugiyama, MD1, Chonte Kang, MD1, Tomonori Takagaki, MD1 and Yoshinori Oka, MD, PhD3

1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokai University Oiso Hospital, 21-1 Gakkyo, Oiso, Naka-gun Kanagawa, 259-0198, Japan.
2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokai University Oiso Hospital, 21-1 Gakkyo, Oiso, Naka-gun Kanagawa, 259-0198, Japan. E-mail address for M. Ikeda: zenryo{at}oiso.u-tokai.ac.jp
3 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, 1838 Ishikawacho, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192-0032, Japan

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokai University Oiso Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan

The original scientific article in which the surgical technique was presented was published in JBJS Vol. 87-A, pp. 76-84, January 2005

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research for or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

The line drawings in this article are the work of Jennifer Fairman (jfairman{at}fairmanstudios.com).

BACKGROUND: Satisfactory internal fixation of comminuted radial head fractures is often difficult to achieve, and radial head resection has been the accepted treatment. In this study, we compared the results of radial head resection with those of open reduction and internal fixation in patients with a comminuted radial head fracture.

METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with a Mason type-III radial head fracture (some with associated injuries) were enrolled in the study. Fifteen patients underwent radial head resection as the initial treatment (Group I), and thirteen patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation (Group II). The age at the operation averaged 41.1 and 38.2 years, respectively, and the duration of follow-up averaged ten and three years, respectively. The outcomes were assessed on the basis of pain, motion, radiographic findings, and strength measured with Cybex testing. The overall outcome was rated with the functional rating score described by Broberg and Morrey and with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Elbow Assessment Form.

RESULTS: Elbow motion averaged 15.5° (extension loss) to 131.4° (flexion) in Group I and 7.1° to 133.8° in Group II. The carrying angle and ulnar variance averaged 8.2° and 1.9 mm in Group I and 1.5° and 0.5 mm in Group II. Compared with Group II, Group I had a loss of strength in extension, pronation, and supination (p < 0.01). The Broberg and Morrey functional rating score averaged 81.4 points in Group I and 90.7 points in Group II (p = 0.0034). The score on the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Elbow Assessment Form averaged 87.3 points in Group I and 94.6 points in Group II (p = 0.0031).

CONCLUSIONS: The patients in whom the comminuted radial head fracture was treated with open reduction and internal fixation had satisfactory joint motion, with greater strength and better function than the patients who had undergone radial head resection. These results support a recommendation for open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of this fracture.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related articles in JBJS:

Comminuted Fractures of the Radial Head. Comparison of Resection and Internal Fixation
Masayoshi Ikeda, Kazuhiro Sugiyama, Chonte Kang, Tomonori Takagaki, and Yoshinori Oka
JBJS 2005 87: 76-84. [Abstract] [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JBJSHome page
P. A. Cole and M. Bhandari
What's New in Orthopaedic Trauma
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 2006; 88(11): 2545 - 2561.
[Full Text] [PDF]