The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2006;88:1-10.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00842
© 2006 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JBJS
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, T. B.
Right arrow Articles by O'Connor, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, T. B.
Right arrow Articles by O'Connor, D. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Surgical Techniques
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Repair of Tears of the Subscapularis

T. Bradley Edwards, MD1, Gilles Walch, MD2, François Sirveaux, MD3, Daniel Molé, MD3, Laurent Nové-Josserand, MD2, Aziz Boulahia, MD2, Lionel Neyton, MD2, Istvan Szabo, MD2, Bruce Lindgren, MS4 and Daniel P. O'Connor, PhD5

1 Fondren Orthopedic Group, 7401 South Main Street, Houston, TX 77030. E-mail address: bemd{at}fondren.com
2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Clinique Sainte Anne Lumière, 85 Cours Albert Thomas, 69003 Lyon, France
3 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Clinique de Traumatologie et d'Orthopédie, 49 Rue Hermite, 54000 Nancy, France
4 Department of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Room A454, Mayo Building MMC303, 420 Delaware Street Southeast, Minneapolis, MN 55455
5 Joe W. King Orthopedic Institute, Texas Orthopedic Hospital, 7401 South Main Street, Houston, TX 77030-4509

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Clinique Sainte Anne Lumière, Lyon, France

The original scientific article in which the surgical technique was presented was published in JBJS Vol. 87-A, pp. 725-730, April 2005

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research for or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

The line drawings in this article are the work of Joanne Haderer Müller of Haderer & Müller (biomedart{at}haderermuller.com).

BACKGROUND: Rotator cuff tears involving the subscapularis are less common than those involving the superior aspect of the rotator cuff. The purpose of the present study was to report the results of repair of isolated tears of the subscapularis.

METHODS: The records on eighty-four shoulders that had undergone open repair of the subscapularis tendon were reviewed. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 53.2 years. The mean interval from the onset of symptoms to the time of surgery was 12.5 months. Fifty-seven tears were traumatic, and twenty-seven were degenerative. Twenty-three tears involved the superior one-third of the subscapularis tendon, forty-one tears involved the superior two-thirds, and twenty tears were complete. Fifty-four shoulders had a dislocation or subluxation of the long head of the biceps tendon, and ten shoulders had a rupture of the long head of the biceps tendon. Forty-eight shoulders underwent concomitant biceps tenodesis, thirteen shoulders underwent concomitant biceps tenotomy, and four shoulders underwent concomitant recentering of the biceps. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically at a mean of forty-five months (range, twenty-four to 132 months) postoperatively.

RESULTS: The mean Constant score increased from 55.0 points preoperatively to 79.5 points postoperatively. Seventy-five patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the result. Preoperatively, four shoulders had mild glenohumeral arthritis. Postoperatively, twenty-five shoulders had mild glenohumeral arthritis and two shoulders had moderate glenohumeral arthritis. Tenodesis or tenotomy of the biceps tendon at the time of subscapularis repair was associated with improved subjective and objective results, independent of the preoperative condition of the biceps tendon.

CONCLUSIONS: Repair of isolated subscapularis tears yields acceptable improvement in shoulder function in selected patients. Additionally, the results of the present study support routine tenodesis or tenotomy of the long head of the biceps tendon at the time of subscapularis repair.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related articles in JBJS:

Repair of Tears of the Subscapularis
T. Bradley Edwards, Gilles Walch, François Sirveaux, Daniel Molé, Laurent Nové-Josserand, Aziz Boulahia, Lionel Neyton, Istvan Szabo, and Bruce Lindgren
JBJS 2005 87: 725-730. [Abstract] [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am J Sports MedHome page
A. Frost, M. S. Zafar, and N. Maffulli
Tenotomy Versus Tenodesis in the Management of Pathologic Lesions of the Tendon of the Long Head of the Biceps Brachii
Am. J. Sports Med., April 1, 2009; 37(4): 828 - 833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]