The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2006;88:2418-2424.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00471
© 2006 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
The Extruded Talus: Results of Reimplantation
Carla S. Smith, MD, PhD1,
Sean E. Nork, MD2 and
Bruce J. Sangeorzan, MD2
1 The Orthopaedic and Neurosurgical Center of the Cascades, 2200 Neff Road,
Suite 200, Bend, OR 97701. E-mail address:
powersmyth{at}aol.com
2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, Box 359798, 325
Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104-2499
Investigation performed at Harborview Medical Center, Seattle,
Washington
NOTE: The authors thank Sarah Holt, Julie Agel, and Erin Owen
for their assistance in preparing this manuscript.
The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their
research for or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments
or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a
commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or
direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational
institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the
authors are affiliated or associated.
Background: There is considerable debate regarding the appropriate
treatment of the extruded talus regardless of the presence of a fracture. The
purpose of this study was to report the clinical results, complications, and
functional outcome following reimplantation of the traumatically extruded
talus.
Methods: A database of 119 patients with an open injury of the talus
occurring between 1995 and 2003 at a level-I trauma center was reviewed to
identify patients with a complete talar extrusion. Demographic, imaging, and
treatment data were obtained from a review of the medical records. Follow-up
was undertaken during clinic visits or by telephone. Preoperative and
follow-up radiographs were reviewed to identify posttraumatic arthritis,
osteonecrosis, or talar collapse, and the Musculoskeletal Functional
Assessment was used to assess functional outcome.
Results: Twenty-seven patients were identified. A minimum follow-up
of one year (average, forty-two months) was obtained for nineteen patients.
Infection and the need for a secondary surgical procedure were the primary
determinants of clinical outcome. Two of the nineteen patients had documented
infections: one had developed at two weeks and one, after a calcaneal
osteotomy at nineteen months. Twelve patients had no subsequent surgery, and
seven had subsequent procedures (range, one to four procedures). No patient
underwent a delayed amputation. The average Musculoskeletal Functional
Assessment score at the time of follow-up was 29.8 (range, 5 to 59). With the
numbers studied, no association was found between functional outcome and the
following variables: ipsilateral lower-extremity injury, associated talar
fracture, secondary procedures, osteonecrosis, or age.
Conclusions: While functional outcome is difficult to assess,
salvage of the extruded talus appears to be a relatively safe operation, with
a minimal risk of infection, which allows maximal flexibility in aftercare by
preserving the most normal ankle anatomy possible.
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions
to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Facebook Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Memisoglu and A. Hurmeydan
Total Extrusion of the Talus in an Adolescent: A Case Report
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc,
September 1, 2009;
99(5):
431 - 434.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. C. Marx and M. S. Mizel
What's New in Foot and Ankle Surgery
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
April 1, 2008;
90(4):
928 - 942.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|