The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2006;88:2380-2385.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00870
© 2006 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the exams for this article:
 Adult Knee Reconstruction Test 13: Winter 2007 (publication date February 1...
CME 4: October, November, December 2006 (publication date January 5, 2007; ...
Right arrow [Supplementary Material]
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dhupar, S.
Right arrow Articles by Dhimitri, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dhupar, S.
Right arrow Articles by Dhimitri, K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Adult Knee
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

A Comparison of Discharge and Two-Week Duplex Ultrasound Screening Protocols for Deep Venous Thrombosis Detection Following Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty

Scott Dhupar, MD1, Richard Iorio, MD1, William L. Healy, MD1 and Kenneth Dhimitri, PT, MA1

1 Scott Dhupar, MD Richard Iorio, MD William L. Healy, MD Kenneth Dhimitri, PT, MA Lahey Clinic Medical Center, 41 Mall Road, Burlington, MA 01805. E-mail address for R. Iorio: Richard.Iorio{at}Lahey.org

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lahey Clinic Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts

A commentary is available with the electronic versions of this article, on our web site (www.jbjs.org) and on our quarterly CD-ROM (call our subscription department, at 781-449-9780, to order the CD-ROM).

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research for or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

Background: Thromboembolic disease in the form of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism is a risk following hip and knee joint replacement. Prophylactic and screening protocols have been employed to prevent thromboembolic disease following lower extremity joint reconstruction. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate two noninvasive venous screening protocols, specifically, compression ultrasonography performed either at the time of hospital discharge or two weeks after the operation.

Methods: From 1994 through 2001, 2364 patients undergoing primary unilateral total hip or total knee arthroplasty were managed with an anticoagulation chemoprophylaxis protocol (adjusted-dose warfarin) until the time of noninvasive venous screening with use of one of two protocols. Nine hundred thirty-one patients (406 hips and 525 knees) underwent compression ultrasonography prior to hospital discharge, and the other 1433 patients (614 hips and 819 knees) underwent ultrasonographic screening two weeks after the operation.

Results: Twenty-three proximal deep venous thromboses (prevalence, 2.5%) were identified in the group that underwent ultrasound screening at the time of hospital discharge, and thirty-one proximal thromboses (prevalence, 2.2%) were identified in the group that underwent ultrasound screening two weeks after the operation. There was no significant difference between the two protocols with regard to the detection of deep venous thrombosis.

Conclusions: There was no significant difference between the group that received two weeks of warfarin chemoprophylactic prophylaxis and the group that was screened at the time of hospital discharge with regard to the detection of deep venous thrombosis with use of compression ultrasound. On the basis of these findings, we no longer screen asymptomatic patients for deep venous thrombosis following hip and knee replacement, and all patients receive warfarin anticoagulation for two weeks.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ChestHome page
W. H. Geerts, D. Bergqvist, G. F. Pineo, J. A. Heit, C. M. Samama, M. R. Lassen, and C. W. Colwell
Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)
Chest, June 1, 2008; 133(6_suppl): 381S - 453S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
M. H. Huo, N. F. Gilbert, and J. Parvizi
What's New in Total Hip Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2007; 89(8): 1874 - 1885.
[Full Text] [PDF]