The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2006;88:2356-2365.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.01146
© 2006 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Impact of Prostheses on Function and Quality of Life for Children with Unilateral Congenital Below-the-Elbow Deficiency
Michelle A. James, MD1,
Anita M. Bagley, PhD1,
Katherine Brasington, MHS, OTR/L2,
Cheryl Lutz, MS, OTR/L3,
Sharon McConnell, MS, CCRC2 and
Fred Molitor, PhD4
1 Shriners Hospital for Children, Northern California, 2425 Stockton Boulevard,
Sacramento, CA 95817. E-mail address for M.A. James:
mjames{at}shrinenet.org
2 Shriners Hospital for Children, 1645 West 8th Street, Erie, PA 16505
3 Shriners Hospital for Children, 3551 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA
19140
4 ETR Associates, 2210 21st Street, Sacramento, CA 95818
Investigation performed at the Shriners Hospital for Children,
Sacramento, California
NOTE: The authors acknowledge the assistance and support of the
Shriners Hospitals UCBED Study Group, which includes, in addition to the
authors: Lisa V. Wagner, OTR (Shriners Hospital for Children, Greenville);
Joanne Libertore, OTR, Becky Ligon, OTR, and Elroy Sullivan, PhD (Shriners
Hospital for Children, Houston); Joanna Patton, OTR, and Joanne Shida, OTR
(Shriners Hospital for Children, Los Angeles); Kathleen Montpetit, BScOT
(Shriners Hospital for Children, Montreal); Susan Anderson, Leslie Clawson,
MSW, Cheryl Hanley, OTR, Joel Lerman, MD, and Carrie Risi-Hart, OTR (Shriners
Hospital for Children, Northern California); Susan Duff, OTR (Shriners
Hospital for Children, Philadelphia); Elaine Charest, OTR (Shriners Hospital
for Children, Springfield); Loray A. Dailey, OTR, and Brian Pinkston, CP/LP
(Shriners Hospital for Children, St. Louis); and Wendy A. Tomhave, OTR
(Shriners Hospital for Children, Twin Cities).
In support of their research for or preparation of this manuscript, one or
more of the authors received grants or funding from the Shriners Hospitals for
Children Clinical Outcomes Studies Advisory Board (COSAB). None of the authors
received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide
such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed,
or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation,
educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with
which the authors are affiliated or associated.
Background: Children with unilateral congenital below-the-elbow
deficiency present a dilemma to clinicians. Parents want the child to have a
prosthesis and, because it seems that the deficiency will cause functional
problems, one is customarily prescribed for infants. Use of the prosthesis is
then encouraged throughout childhood. However, these children frequently
abandon the prosthesis. There are no evidence-based guidelines regarding
prescription of prostheses or standard methods for assessing use and
function.
Methods: A multicenter outcomes study was done to assess the quality
of life and function of 489 children with a unilateral congenital
below-the-elbow deficiency; 321 wore a prosthesis, and 168 did not. The
Unilateral Below-the-Elbow Test (UBET) was designed, validated, and
administered to these children along with several outcomes measures, including
the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI), the Pediatric
Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL), and the Prosthetic Upper Extremity
Functional Index (PUFI).
Results: Use of a prosthesis was not associated with any clinically
relevant differences in PODCI or PedsQL scores. Non-wearers performed either
the same as or better than wearers on the UBET. When queried (with use of the
PUFI) about performance of various tasks, non-wearers scored themselves higher
than wearers. Children with a unilateral congenital below-the-elbow deficiency
scored the same as or higher than the general population on the PedsQL. They
scored significantly lower than the general population on the PODCI Upper
Extremity Physical Function Domain and higher on the Happiness Domain, but the
differences were small.
Conclusions: Prostheses may help with social acceptance or may be
useful as tools for specialized activities, but they do not appear to improve
function or quality of life, which are nearly normal for children with
unilateral congenital below-the-elbow deficiency regardless of whether they
wear a prosthesis. These findings call into question the standard practices of
fitting infants with prostheses and encouraging young children to wear the
prosthesis.
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions
to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Facebook Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. C. Sheffler, C. Hanley, A. Bagley, F. Molitor, and M. A. James
Comparison of Self-Reports and Parent Proxy-Reports of Function and Quality of Life of Children with Below-the-Elbow Deficiency
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
December 1, 2009;
91(12):
2852 - 2859.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Satoh, M. A. James, and D. M. Gardiner
The Role of Nerve Signaling in Limb Genesis and Agenesis During Axolotl Limb Regeneration
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
July 1, 2009;
91(Supplement_4):
90 - 98.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|