The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2006;88:2237-2242.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.01447
© 2006 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the exams for this article:
 Sports Test 10: Winter 2007 (publication date February 15, 2007; expiration...
CME 4: October, November, December 2006 (publication date January 5, 2007; ...
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sormaala, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Pihlajamäki, H. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sormaala, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Pihlajamäki, H. K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Foot/Ankle
Right arrow Sports
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Stress Injuries of the Calcaneus Detected with Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Military Recruits

Markus J. Sormaala, MD1, Maria H. Niva, MD, PhD1, Martti J. Kiuru, MD, PhD, MSc1, Ville M. Mattila, MD, PhD1 and Harri K. Pihlajamäki, MD, PhD1

1 Centre of Military Medicine, P.O. Box 50, FIN-00301 Helsinki, Finland. E-mail for M.J. Sormaala: markus.sormaala{at}welho.com

Investigation performed at Central Military Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

In support of their research for or preparation of this manuscript, one or more of the authors received grants or outside funding from the Scientific Committee of National Defense in Finland, the Radiological Society of Finland, and the Pehr Oscar Klingendahl Foundation. None of the authors received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

Background: Calcaneal stress injuries are fairly common overuse injuries in military recruits and athletes. We assessed the anatomic distribution, nature, and healing of calcaneal stress injuries in a group of military recruits.

Methods: Military recruits who underwent magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of exercise-induced ankle and/or heel pain were identified from the medical archives. The magnetic resonance images, plain radiographs, and medical records of these patients were evaluated with regard to fracture type and the natural history of the injury.

Results: Over ninety-six months, magnetic resonance imaging revealed calcaneal stress injuries in thirty recruits in a population with a total exposure time of 117,149 person-years, yielding an incidence of 2.6 (95% confidence interval, 1.6 to 3.4) per 10,000 person-years. Four patients exhibited a bilateral injury. Of the thirty-four injuries, nineteen occurred in the posterior part of the calcaneus, six occurred in the middle part of the calcaneus, and nine occurred in the anterior part of the calcaneus, with 79% occurring in the upper region and 21% occurring in the lower region. The calcaneus alone was affected in twelve cases. In twenty-two cases, stress injury was also present in one or several other tarsal bones. A distinct association emerged between injuries of the different parts of the calcaneus and stress injuries in the surrounding bones. In only 15% of the patients was the stress injury visible on plain radiographs. With the numbers available, there were no significant differences between the patients with calcaneal stress injuries and unaffected recruits with regard to age, height, weight, body mass index, or physical fitness.

Conclusions: The majority of stress injuries of the calcaneus occur in the posterior part of the bone, but a considerable proportion can also be found in the middle and anterior parts. To obtain a diagnosis, magnetic resonance imaging is warranted if plain radiography does not show abnormalities in a physically active patient with exercise-induced pain in the ankle or heel.

Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JBJSHome page
R. C. Marx and M. S. Mizel
What's New in Foot and Ankle Surgery
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2008; 90(4): 928 - 942.
[Full Text] [PDF]