The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2006;88:2231-2236.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00247
© 2006 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
High Placement of Noncemented Acetabular Components in Revision Total Hip ArthroplastyA Concise Follow-Up, at a Minimum of Fifteen Years, of a Previous Report*
Kelly J. Hendricks, MD1 and
William H. Harris, MD, DSc2
1 Kelly J. Hendricks, MD Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas
Medical Center, MS 3017, 3905 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS 66210. E-mail
address for K.J. Hendricks:
kchendri2002{at}yahoo.com
2 William H. Harris, MD, DSc Harris Orthopaedic Biomechanics and Biomaterials
Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street GRJ 1126, Boston,
MA, 02114. E-mail address for W.H. Harris:
wharris.obbl{at}partners.org
Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and
the Harris Orthopaedic Biomechanics and Biomaterials Laboratory, Massachusetts
General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Dearborn JT, Harris WH. High placement of an acetabular component inserted
without cement in a revision total hip arthroplasty. Results after a mean of
ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:469-80.
In support of their research for or preparation of this manuscript, one or
more of the authors received grants or outside funding from the William H.
Harris Foundation. In addition, one or more of the authors received payments
or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a
commercial entity (Zimmer, Inc.). Also, a commercial entity (Zimmer, Inc.)
paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, benefits to a research fund,
foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit
organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.
* Original Publication
We previously reported the average ten-year results associated with the use
of porous-coated noncemented acetabular shells that were placed at a high hip
center at the time of revision total hip arthroplasty in thirty-four patients
(thirty-six hips) with severe acetabular bone loss. We now report the average
16.8-year results for twenty-one patients (twenty-three hips). Of the original
cohort of forty-four patients (forty-six hips), thirty-nine patients
(forty-one hips; 89%) retained the shell. Two shells (4.3%) were revised
because of aseptic loosening, and three (6.5%) were revised because of
infection. Six femoral components were revised because of femoral osteolysis,
and seven were revised because of aseptic loosening without osteolysis. On the
basis of our results after an average duration of follow-up of 16.8 years, we
believe that the placement of an uncemented acetabular component at a high hip
center continues to be an excellent technique for revision total hip
arthroplasty in selected patients with severe acetabular bone loss.
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions
to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Facebook Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. K. Park, C. J. Della Valle, L. Quigley, M. Moric, A. G. Rosenberg, and J. O. Galante
Revision of the Acetabular Component without Cement. A Concise Follow-up, at Twenty to Twenty-four Years, of a Previous Report
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
February 1, 2009;
91(2):
350 - 355.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|