The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2006;88:35-40.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.02795
© 2006 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Deficits Following Nonoperative Treatment of Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures
Michael D. McKee, MD, FRCS(C)1,
Elizabeth M. Pedersen, MD1,
Caroline Jones, BSc, PT1,
David J.G. Stephen, MD, FRCS(C)2,
Hans J. Kreder, MD, FRCS(C)2,
Emil H. Schemitsch, MD, FRCS(C)1,
Lisa M. Wild, BScN1 and
Jeffrey Potter, BSc1
1 Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital and
the University of Toronto, 55 Queen Street East, Suite 800, Toronto, ON M5C
1R6, Canada. E-mail address for M.D. McKee:
mckeem{at}smh.toronto.on.ca
2 Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health
Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
Investigation performed at the Division of Orthopaedics, Department of
Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital and the University of Toronto, Toronto,
Ontario, Canada
The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their
research for or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments
or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a
commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or
direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational
institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the
authors are affiliated or associated.
Background: Displaced fractures of the midpart of the clavicular
shaft are generally treated nonoperatively, and few functional deficits have
been reported. Whereas prior investigators have presented radiographic and
surgeon-based outcomes, we used a patient-based outcome questionnaire and
objective muscle-strength testing to evaluate a series of patients who had
received nonoperative care for a displaced midshaft fracture of the
clavicle.
Methods: We identified thirty patients (twenty-two men and eight
women with a mean age of thirty-seven years) who had sustained a displaced
midshaft fracture of the clavicle. All patients were treated nonoperatively.
At a mean of fifty-five months, and a minimum of twelve months, outcomes were
measured with the Constant shoulder score and the DASH (Disabilities of the
Arm, Shoulder and Hand) patient questionnaire. In addition, objective shoulder
muscle-strength testing was performed with the Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment
Work Simulator, with the uninjured arm serving as a control.
Results: The range of motion was well maintained, with flexion
averaging 170° ± 20° and abduction averaging 165° ±
25°. Compared with the strength of the uninjured shoulder, the strength of
the injured shoulder was reduced to 81% for maximum flexion, 75% for endurance
of flexion, 82% for maximum abduction, 67% for endurance of abduction, 81% for
maximum external rotation, 82% for endurance of external rotation, 85% for
maximum internal rotation, and 78% for endurance of internal rotation (p <
0.05 for all values). The mean Constant score was 71 points, and the mean DASH
score was 24.6 points, indicating substantial residual disability.
Conclusions: Traditionally, good results with minimal functional
deficits have been reported following nonoperative treatment of clavicular
fractures. However, surgeon-based methods of evaluation may be insensitive to
loss of muscle strength. We detected residual deficits in shoulder strength
and endurance in this patient population, which may be related to the
significant level of dysfunction detected by the patient-based outcome
measures.
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See
Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L.A. K. Khan, T. J. Bradnock, C. Scott, and C. M. Robinson
Fractures of the Clavicle
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
February 1, 2009;
91(2):
447 - 460.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. C. Taylor and K. L. Krasinski
Adolescent Shoulder Injuries: Consensus and Controversies
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
February 1, 2009;
91(2):
462 - 473.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. A. Altamimi, M. D. McKee, and the Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society
Nonoperative Treatment Compared with Plate Fixation of Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures. Surgical Technique
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
March 1, 2008;
90(Supplement_2__Part_1):
1 - 8.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. I. Huang, P. Toogood, M. R. Chen, J. H. Wilber, and D. R. Cooperman
Clavicular Anatomy and the Applicability of Precontoured Plates
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
October 1, 2007;
89(10):
2260 - 2265.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. J. Jeray
Acute Midshaft Clavicular Fracture
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg.,
April 1, 2007;
15(4):
239 - 248.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society
Nonoperative Treatment Compared with Plate Fixation of Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures. A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
January 1, 2007;
89(1):
1 - 10.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. A. Cole and M. Bhandari
What's New in Orthopaedic Trauma
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
November 1, 2006;
88(11):
2545 - 2561.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|