The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2005;87:2065-2074.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.02045
© 2005 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the activities for this article:
Shoulder/Elbow Test 13: Fall 2005
CME 3: July, August, September 2005
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Safran, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, T. Q.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Safran, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, T. Q.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Effects of Elbow Flexion and Forearm Rotation on Valgus Laxity of the Elbow

Marc R. Safran, MD1, Michelle H. McGarry, MS2, Steve Shin, MD2, Steve Han, BS2 and Thay Q. Lee, PhD2

1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, 500 Parnassus Avenue, MU 320W, San Francisco, CA 94143. E-mail address: safranm{at}orthosurg.ucsf.edu
2 Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, VA Long Beach Healthcare System (09/151), and University of California, Irvine, 5901 East 7th Street, Long Beach, CA 90822. E-mail addresses for T.Q. Lee: tqlee{at}med.va.gov; tqlee{at}uci.edu

Investigation performed at Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, VA Long Beach Healthcare System (09/151) and University of California, Irvine, Long Beach, California

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.


Background: Clinical evaluation of valgus elbow laxity is difficult. The optimum position of elbow flexion and forearm rotation with which to identify valgus laxity in a patient with an injury of the ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow has not been determined. The purpose of the present study was to determine the effect of forearm rotation and elbow flexion on valgus elbow laxity.

Methods: Twelve intact cadaveric upper extremities were studied with a custom elbow-testing device. Laxity was measured with the forearm in pronation, supination, and neutral rotation at 30°, 50°, and 70° of elbow flexion with use of 2 Nm of valgus torque. Testing was conducted with the ulnar collateral ligament intact, with the joint vented, after cutting of the anterior half (six specimens) or posterior half (six specimens) of the anterior oblique ligament of the ulnar collateral ligament, and after complete sectioning of the anterior oblique ligament. Laxity was measured in degrees of valgus angulation in different positions of elbow flexion and forearm rotation.

Results: There were no significant differences in valgus laxity with respect to elbow flexion within each condition. Overall, for both groups of specimens (i.e., specimens in which the anterior or posterior half of the anterior oblique ligament was cut), neutral forearm rotation resulted in greater valgus laxity than pronation or supination did (p < 0.05). Transection of the anterior half of the anterior oblique ligament did not significantly increase valgus laxity; however, transection of the posterior half resulted in increased valgus laxity in some positions. Full transection of the anterior oblique ligament significantly increased valgus laxity in all positions (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: The results of this in vitro cadaveric study demonstrated that forearm rotation had a significant effect on varus-valgus laxity. Laxity was always greatest in neutral forearm rotation throughout the ranges of elbow flexion and the various surgical conditions.

Clinical Relevance: The information obtained from the present study suggests that forearm rotation affects varus-valgus elbow laxity. Additional investigation is warranted to determine if forearm rotation should be considered in the evaluation and treatment of ulnar collateral ligament injuries of the elbow joint.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
T. Mihata, M. R. Safran, M. H. McGarry, M. Abe, and T. Q. Lee
Elbow Valgus Laxity May Result in an Overestimation of Apparent Shoulder External Rotation During Physical Examination
Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2008; 36(5): 978 - 982.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
D Eygendaal, M R Safran, D Eygendaal, and M R Safran
Postero-medial elbow problems in the adult athlete * Commentary.
Br. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2006; 40(5): 430 - 434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]