The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2005;87:1965-1971.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.02440
© 2005 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Survival Following Total Hip Replacement
Jane Barrett, MSc1,
Elena Losina, PhD2,
John A. Baron, MD, MSc1,
Nizar N. Mahomed, MD, ScD3,
John Wright, MD4 and
Jeffrey N. Katz, MD, MS4
1 Departments of Medicine (J.A.B.) and Community and Family Medicine (J.B. and
J.A.B.), and Section of Biostatistics and Epidemiology (J.B. and J.A.B.),
Dartmouth Medical School, Evergreen Building, Suite 300, 46 Centerra Parkway,
Lebanon, NH 03766. E-mail address for J. Barrett:
jane.a.barrett{at}dartmouth.edu
2 Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, 715
Albany Street, TE421, Boston, MA 02118
3 Musculoskeletal Health and Arthritis Program, Toronto Western Hospital,
University Health Network, University of Toronto, 399 Bathurst Street,
Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
4 Section of Clinical Sciences, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy
(J.N.K.) and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (J.W. and J.N.K.), Brigham and
Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115
Investigation performed at Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, New
Hampshire, and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
In support of their research or preparation of this manuscript, one or more
of the authors received grants or outside funding from the National Institute
of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) and from the
Arthritis Foundation. None of the authors received payments or other benefits
or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial
entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any
benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other
charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or
associated.
Background: Several studies have shown that patients who undergo
total hip replacement live longer than control subjects, but the reason for
this apparent protective effect is not clear. The purpose of our investigation
was to assess whether the association had the characteristics of a causal
relationship or whether it might appear to be due to comorbidity or other
factors.
Methods: We compared survival over a six-year period for 28,469
Medicare enrollees who had elective primary total hip replacement in 1996 and
a control group from the general Medicare population, matched 5:1 on year of
birth, sex, race, and whether the Medicaid program paid the Medicare premium
(a proxy for low income). For both the patients treated with total hip
replacement and the control subjects, we used Medicare hospital claims to
ascertain comorbidity, that is, whether the patient had had any of sixteen
serious discharge diagnoses in the year prior to the total hip replacement (or
an equivalent date for the controls). The survival patterns for the total hip
arthroplasty and control cohorts were compared with use of proportional
hazards regression for three follow-up periods: the first ninety days after
surgery (or an equivalent date for the controls), ninety days to five years
after surgery, and more than five years after surgery.
Results: The total hip replacement cohort had less comorbidity than
the controls, with an approximately 30% lower prevalence for most serious
diseases. Sex, age, Medicaid eligibility, and earlier serious comorbid
diagnoses were important predictors of survival, but, even in analyses that
adjusted for these variables, the total hip replacement cohort had better
long-term survival than the controls. The patients who had a total hip
replacement had a higher rate of mortality than the controls immediately after
surgery, but, by three months postoperatively, the mortality rate for the
patients was well below that for the controls. The overall rate of survival
during the first ninety days was comparable for the two groups. From three
months to five years after surgery, the mortality rate for the patients who
had a total hip replacement was only two-thirds of that for the controls.
After five years, the mortality rates for the two groups appeared to be
converging.
Conclusions: Total hip replacement recipients survive longer than do
matched controls in the Medicare population. The very rapid emergence of the
lower mortality rate suggests that it is due to the selection of low-risk
patients for elective surgery. However, our admittedly crude adjustment for
comorbidity did not diminish the protective effect, so some effect of the
procedure itself cannot be ruled out.
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See
Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Facebook Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Singh and J. A. Sloan
Health-related quality of life in veterans with prevalent total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty
Rheumatology,
December 1, 2008;
47(12):
1826 - 1831.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Lau, K. Ong, S. Kurtz, J. Schmier, and A. Edidin
Mortality Following the Diagnosis of a Vertebral Compression Fracture in the Medicare Population
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
July 1, 2008;
90(7):
1479 - 1486.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Kurtz, K. L. Ong, J. Schmier, F. Mowat, K. Saleh, E. Dybvik, J. Karrholm, G. Garellick, L. I. Havelin, O. Furnes, et al.
Future Clinical and Economic Impact of Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
October 1, 2007;
89(suppl_3):
144 - 151.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Agabiti, S. Picciotto, G. Cesaroni, L. Bisanti, F. Forastiere, R. Onorati, B. Pacelli, P. Pandolfi, A. Russo, T. Spadea, et al.
The influence of socioeconomic status on utilization and outcomes of elective total hip replacement: a multicity population-based longitudinal study
Int. J. Qual. Health Care,
February 1, 2007;
19(1):
37 - 44.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|