The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2005;87:1761-1768.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.C.01616
© 2005 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the activities for this article:
CME 3: July, August, September 2005
Trauma Test 9: Fall 2005
Right arrow [Supplementary Material]
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kubiak, E. N.
Right arrow Articles by Koval, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kubiak, E. N.
Right arrow Articles by Koval, K. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pediatrics
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Operative Treatment of Tibial Fractures in Children: Are Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nails an Improvement Over External Fixation?

Erik N. Kubiak, MD1, Kenneth A. Egol, MD1, David Scher, MD1, Bradley Wasserman, PA1, David Feldman, MD1 and Kenneth J. Koval, MD1

1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU—Hospital for Joint Diseases, 14th Floor, 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY 10003. E-mail address for K.A. Egol: ljegol{at}att.net

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU—Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY

A commentary is available with the electronic versions of this article, on our web site (www.jbjs.org) and on our quarterly CD-ROM (call our subscription department, at 781-449-9780, to order the CD-ROM).

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.


Background: Operative treatment of tibial fractures in children requires implants that do not violate open physes while maintaining tibial length and alignment. Both elastic stable intramedullary nails and external fixation can be utilized. We retrospectively reviewed our experience with these two techniques to determine if one is superior to the other.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the operative records and trauma registries of three institutions within our hospital system and identified thirty-five consecutive patients with open physes who had undergone operative treatment of a tibial fracture between April 1997 and June 2004. Four patients were excluded because they had been managed with locked intramedullary nails or with pins and plaster. Of the thirty-one remaining patients, sixteen had been managed with elastic stable intramedullary nails and fifteen had been managed with unilateral external fixation. The clinical and radiographic outcomes were compared. The functional outcomes were compared with use of the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument. Complications related to treatment, such as malunion, delayed union, nonunion, infection, and the need for subsequent surgical treatment also were compared.

Results: Thirty-one patients with thirty-one operatively treated tibial fractures were available for evaluation. Fifteen patients had been managed with external fixation. Seven of these patients had a closed fracture, and eight had an open fracture. There were seven healing complications in this group, including two delayed unions, three nonunions, and two malunions. Sixteen patients had been managed with elastic stable intramedullary nailing. Eleven patients had a closed fracture, and five had an open fracture. The mean time to union for the intramedullary nailing group (seven weeks) was significantly shorter than that for the external fixation group (eighteen weeks) (p < 0.01). The functional outcomes for the intramedullary nailing group were significantly better than those for the external fixation group in the categories of pain, happiness, sports, and global function (the mean of the mean scores of the first four categories) (p < 0.01 for these comparisons).

Conclusions: When surgical stabilization of tibial fractures in children is indicated, we believe that the preferred method of fixation is with elastic stable intramedullary nailing.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
V. R. P. Vallamshetla, U. De Silva, C. E. Bache, and P. J. Gibbons
Flexible intramedullary nails for unstable fractures of the tibia in children: AN EIGHT-YEAR EXPERIENCE
J Bone Joint Surg Br, April 1, 2006; 88-B(4): 536 - 540.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
D. G. Stewart Jr., R. M. Kay, and D. L. Skaggs
Open Fractures in Children. Principles of Evaluation and Management
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2005; 87(12): 2784 - 2798.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Letters to the Editor:

Read all Letters to the Editor

Operative Treatment of Tibial Fractures in Children
Rahul Kakar, et al.
JBJS Online, 4 Jan 2006 [Full text]
Dr, Egol and colleagues repond to Dr. Kakar, et al
Kenneth Egol, M.D., et al.
JBJS Online, 21 Feb 2006 [Full text]