The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2005;87:1725-1731.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.02745
© 2005 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Pain Dominates Measurements of Elbow Function and Health Status
Job N. Doornberg, MS1,
David Ring, MD1,
Lauren M. Fabian, BA1,
Leah Malhotra, BA1,
David Zurakowski, PhD2 and
Jesse B. Jupiter, MD1
1 Massachusetts General Hospital, Yawkee Center, Suite 2100, 55 Fruit Street,
Boston, MA 02114. E-mail address for D. Ring:
dring{at}partners.org
2 Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115
Investigation performed at the Orthopaedic Hand and Upper Extremity
Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
In support of their research or preparation of this manuscript, one or more
of the authors received grants or outside funding from the AO Foundation
(unrestricted grant), Joint Active Systems, Fulbright Scholarship, and Dutch
Anna Fonds Scholarship. None of the authors received payments or other
benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a
commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or
direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational
institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the
authors are affiliated or associated.
Background: Elbow function can be quantified with use of
physician-based elbow-rating systems and health status questionnaires. Our
hypothesis was that pain has a strong influence on these scores, which
overwhelms the influence of objective factors such as motion.
Methods: One hundred and four patients were evaluated, at a minimum
of six months (average, forty-six months) after the latest surgery for an
intra-articular fracture of the elbow, with use of three physician-based
evaluation instruments (Mayo Elbow Performance Index [MEPI], Broberg and
Morrey rating system, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Elbow
Evaluation Instrument [ASES]), an upper-extremity-specific health status
questionnaire (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH]), and a
general health status questionnaire (Short Form-36 [SF-36]). Multivariate
analysis of variance and regression modeling were used to identify the factors
that account for the variability in scores derived with these
measuresin other words, which factors have the strongest influence on
the final score.
Results: Pain alone accounted for 66% of the variability in the MEPI
scores, 59% of the variability in the Broberg and Morrey scores, and 57% of
the variability in the ASES scores. Models that included other factors
accounted for only slightly more variability (73%, 79%, and 79%,
respectively), and those that did not include pain accounted for only 22%,
41%, and 41% of the variability. Thirty-six percent of the variability in the
DASH scores could be accounted for by pain alone, and 45% could be accounted
for by pain and range of motion. Models not including pain accounted for only
17% of the variability in the DASH scores.
Conclusions: Pain has a very strong influence on both
physician-rated and patient-rated quantitative measures of elbow function.
Consequently, these measures may be strongly influenced by the psychosocial
aspects of illness that have a strong relationship with pain, and objective
measures of elbow function such as mobility may be undervalued. It may be
advisable to evaluate pain separately from objective measures of elbow
function in physician-based elbow ratings.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Facebook Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A.-M. Vranceanu, A. Barsky, and D. Ring
Psychosocial Aspects of Disabling Musculoskeletal Pain
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
August 1, 2009;
91(8):
2014 - 2018.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. L.C. Lindenhovius, G. A. Buijze, P. Kloen, and D. C. Ring
Correspondence Between Perceived Disability and Objective Physical Impairment After Elbow Trauma
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
October 1, 2008;
90(10):
2090 - 2097.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
U. G. Longo, F. Franceschi, M. Loppini, N. Maffulli, and V. Denaro
Rating systems for evaluation of the elbow
Br. Med. Bull.,
September 1, 2008;
87(1):
131 - 161.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. P. Droll, P. Perna, J. Potter, E. Harniman, E. H. Schemitsch, and M. D. McKee
Outcomes Following Plate Fixation of Fractures of Both Bones of the Forearm in Adults
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
December 1, 2007;
89(12):
2619 - 2624.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. C. Chen and J. B. Jupiter
Management of Distal Radial Fractures
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
September 1, 2007;
89(9):
2051 - 2062.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. N. Doornberg, P. J. van Duijn, D. Linzel, D. C. Ring, D. Zurakowski, R. K. Marti, and P. Kloen
Surgical Treatment of Intra-Articular Fractures of the Distal Part of the Humerus. Functional Outcome After Twelve to Thirty Years
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
July 1, 2007;
89(7):
1524 - 1532.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D.P. Forward, A.K. Singh, T.M. Lawrence, J.S. Sithole, T.R.C. Davis, and J.A. Oni
Preservation of the Ulnar Bursa Within the Carpal Tunnel: Does It Improve the Outcome of Carpal Tunnel Surgery? A Randomized, Controlled Trial
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
November 1, 2006;
88(11):
2432 - 2438.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. D. Gramstad and L. M. Galatz
Management of Elbow Osteoarthritis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
February 1, 2006;
88(2):
421 - 430.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|