The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2005;87:1706-1711.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.02339
© 2005 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the activity for this article:
Adult Knee Reconstruction Test 10: Fa...
Right arrow [Supplementary Material]
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Sign up for keyword alerts
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sisto, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, I. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sisto, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, I. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Adult Knee
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

UniSpacer Arthroplasty of the Knee

Domenick J. Sisto, MD1 and Isaac L. Mitchell, MD1

1 Los Angeles Orthopaedic Institute, 4955 Van Nuys Boulevard, Suite 615, Sherman Oaks, CA 91403. E-mail address for D.J. Sisto: laortho1{at}yahoo.com

Investigation performed at the Los Angeles Orthopaedic Institute, Sherman Oaks, California

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

A commentary is available with the electronic versions of this article, on our web site (www.jbjs.org) and on our quarterly CD-ROM (call our subscription department, at 781-449-9780, to order the CD-ROM).


Background: The operative treatment of medial compartment knee arthritis is controversial. The purpose of the present study was to report the experience of a single surgeon with the UniSpacer arthroplasty for the treatment of isolated medial compartment arthritis of the knee.

Methods: From April 2002 through November 2002, thirty-seven UniSpacer arthroplasties were performed in thirty-four patients for the treatment of arthritis that primarily involved the medial compartment of the knee. The Ahlbäck radiographic evaluation scale was used to grade the severity of arthritis; the mean preoperative score was 2.6 points for the medial compartment and 0.5 point for both the lateral and patellofemoral compartments. The study group included eighteen women (nineteen knees) and sixteen men (eighteen knees) who had a mean age of fifty-five years (range, forty-two to seventy-five years) at the time of surgery. Twelve patients had had a previous arthroscopic meniscectomy. The mean preoperative Knee Society function score was 60 points (range, 40 to 80 points), and the mean preoperative Knee Society objective score was 62 points (range, 40 to 76 points).

Results: After a mean duration of follow-up of twenty-six months (range, twenty-four to twenty-nine months), there were no excellent, ten good, fifteen fair, and twelve poor results. The mean postoperative total function score was 69 points (range, 40 to 82 points), and the mean Knee Society objective score was 72 points (range, 45 to 88 points). Six of the twelve poor results were in knees that had dislocation of the UniSpacer. All twelve knees were revised to a total knee arthroplasty.

Conclusions: On the basis of this experience, we do not recommend UniSpacer arthroplasty for the treatment of degenerative arthritis of the medial compartment of the knee.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
J. Richmond, D. Hunter, J. Irrgang, M. H. Jones, B. Levy, R. Marx, L. Snyder-Mackler, W. C. Watters III, R. H. Haralson III, C. M. Turkelson, et al.
Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee (Nonarthroplasty)
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., September 1, 2009; 17(9): 591 - 600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. J. Archibeck and R. E. White Jr.
What's New in Adult Reconstructive Knee Surgery
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2006; 88(7): 1677 - 1686.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Letters to the Editor:

Read all Letters to the Editor

Management of Failed UniSpacer Arthroplasty of the Knee
Athanasios V. PAPAVASILEIOU, BSc, M.D., Ph.D., et al.
JBJS Online, 25 Oct 2005 [Full text]
Dr. Sisto responds to Dr. Papavasileiou
Domenick J Sisto, M.D.
JBJS Online, 25 Oct 2005 [Full text]